Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

YET another VERY bad move by BK... Scraping Broxton?!

http://www.extremetech.com/computing/227523-intel-kills-upcoming-smartphone-and-tablet-hardware

Agreed that SoFIA did not do any well and just was huge waste of monies to INTEL, but, what The (IN)Hell, has Broxton to do with all this? It was planned as main force/the next generation for tablets and small laptop form factors.

Broxton should be not scrapped, just in contrary. This one is good replacement for all previous ATOM lines, as final successor/final one before switching to CORE on-fly-design?!

And yet... they plan now to continue with Apollo Lake, as embedded version of Broxton to hit the market at the end of Y2016??? But this one is nothing less or more that Broxton based on Goldmont core (in different packaging) itself!

These people, INTEL executives... What they are really smokin'? Some strong synthetics, or what (the hell)I? Scrapping INTEL executives' brains really fast! ;-)

Time Will Tell!

by Time Will Tell
| 2551 views | | 13 replies (last April 30, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HaPw4Re
Comment! It's anonymous!

13 replies (most recent on top)

Apollo lake is announced in recent idf shenzhen. They cant kill it right?

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @usy+HaPw4Re

Apollo lake is announcee in idf shenzhen... they cant be that stupid To kill it right?

by Ghostbtr
| | Reply
Post ID: @tzh+HaPw4Re

@HaPw4Re-soc, let me guess Ur "confidential" information"... U R counting on IOT variances, so you'll go forward and make Apollo Lake the next successor of embedded ARM family line in IOT space??? Making INTEL IOT 20% growth YoY in IOT space by betting on it?

Really? Is it so? ;-)

(you can even succeed, but U do NOT/have no clue know how to do that)

Time Will Tell!

by Time Will Tell
| | Reply
Post ID: @bsk+HaPw4Re

To answer your question it will require disclosing confidential information, so only those involved with this program at Intel understand the why it is so.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @soc+HaPw4Re

OK, OK. I am clueless, I am an idiot... Agree. ;-)

But. If executive management decide still to go with Apollo Lake - I (Broxton/BXT embedded variant), it seems that they did terrible/catastrophic job, what I am reading here.

Either they scrapped it all, either they continue with the BXT program. ON/OFF strategy, I do not see nuthin' but loses and devastation with the current strategy.

In nutshell, who will as a big customer go with the embedded variant, when the CCG ones are scrapped (this never happened before)???

And some of you say: hey, ARM is prevailing also in embedded space, so WTF?!

Time Will Tell!

by Time Will Tell
| | Reply
Post ID: @uly+HaPw4Re

Typing this on a ZenFone. It is really very good. Sheer incompetence that Intel could not capture more of Phone market.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @hqk+HaPw4Re

Krzanich would rather be in his sandbox playing with his toy drone.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @syb+HaPw4Re

The Zen phone 2 (moorefield) was a very compelling product. Not sure why they try to improve on that; maybe it has to do with low margins.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @vns+HaPw4Re

OP is clueless.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @vfi+HaPw4Re

Best decision by BK and Murthy.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @eoj+HaPw4Re

Broxton can NOT compete against ARM SoCs in both price and tech, if anything it is behind by at least a year now versus leading edge ARM SoCs. Based on this was a no brainer even for Intel execs.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @qtr+HaPw4Re

Broxton has to go. Need to make room for new money maker: Drones!

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @grs+HaPw4Re

Tablet market is dead and Core M is winning the intermediate market. Bxt is unnecessary.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @clq+HaPw4Re

Post a reply

: