If you insist on distributing the money in a bell curve, someone is always on the bottom. Our 'new bottom' is in this years Successful SL3 crowd
9 replies (most recent on top)
Everyone for himself going forward is my biggest fear. Say you have someone on your team struggling to ramp up on something. Do you help him out or let him be the SL4 at the end of the year so that you don't be the SL4? Philosophically, I agree with moving under performers out of the company. I'm not 100% sold on the process and the selection criteria, though.
Tell me who would share or be inclusive of anyone after this action and last year? Everyone for themselves.
Richard Taylor can go f--- himself. Evil piece of sh--.
The underlying message is if you have been 'just' successful for too long (i.e. 'not growing') you will be offered VSP. That is loud and clear.
Lot's of really important work that drives success is coming out of HR! I guess they're all safe.
I never watched that stupid video. Maybe there's a list of us for tomorrow. :O
They will also drive autonomy
Well, the layoffs will be "inclusive".