Been with intel for 2yrs 4 months now. Last year I was "Successful" with SSL 4 (APB taget 1.9%) and this year my APB target is higher 26% with "Successful" and SSL3. Am I on the axe?
18 replies (most recent on top)
I left at 11am this morning. Has my boss noticed yet?
No one implied that an Engineer defined the criteria for ISP. The implication was that the bullet points were written by an Engineer, probably one who now manages people/works in HR.
50% of Intel would get ss3
I wonder if the criteria dips into current ss3. That number 3500 looked small.
They also mention that the average pay for an Intel employee in Orgeon is 170,000. Holy cow!
Does that mean the criteria can be any worse? like dipping into ss3?
Engineers do not define these criteria. Bain Consulting does!
There are individuals on this thread that desperately want the leaked slide to be a fraud but it's not. It's authentic and the person who wrote it used both poor grammar and poor sentence structure when laying out the criteria in The form of bullet points. Anyone who works at intel knows that it's a company of Engineers who can barely write a complete sentence.
Ya those bullet points are very poorly written. No way can it be a legitimate/approved document.
Intel trying to find the mole by releasing info gradually. It's not going to work - too many insiders to pinpoint the mole!
If the bullet points are poorly written then doesn't that qualify as inaccurate?
Also, there's no other way to interpret the bullets logically, sorry. I don't doubt there's more to it, but again that makes the leak less than accurate.
ACT says there is "...some degree of inaccuracy" in the social media leaks. It doesn't refer to what exactly is inaccurate or to what degree. To me that shouts out that most of it is on target.
wis- You mean more criteria for ISP might be omitted?
Should be working for Oregonian. They'll keep you more informed than Intel does.
The slide is not inaccurate, (you'll see soon enough) it only leaves off additional criteria. The two bullet points are poorly written and are being interpreted incorrectly.
The ISP criteria might be wrong.
It says the leaks are inaccurate. Judging by the 3 bullets having major redundancy, they're probably telling the truth