Thread regarding Schlumberger Ltd. layoffs

More layoffs in Q2 (beyond 8,000 in Q1 reported below)

Schlumberger cuts 8,000 jobs in first quarter in ‘toughest environment’ in decades

Posted by Jordan Blum Date: April 22, 2016

Schlumberger eliminated 8,000 jobs in the first three months of the year, bringing the workforce of the world’s largest oil field services company down by nearly one-third since cuts began in late 2014.

Schlumberger, headquartered in Houston, Paris and The Hague, has now cut 40,000 jobs with more expected in a difficult second quarter, Chairman and CEO Paal Kibsgaard said Friday in a conference call. Schlumberger did not disclose where the job cuts occurred.

Schlumberger’s worldwide head count only decreased from 95,000 to about 93,000 — as low as 92,500 now — but the company reclassified 5,500 contractors as permanent employees, so the overall reduction was 8,000 employees, Kibsgaard clarified Friday.

by
| 3121 views | | 10 replies (last April 25, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+H2HtDCo

10 replies (most recent on top)

95000 employees (contractors not included in theheadcount numbers)

Plus classify 5500-ish contractors to be included in headcount

Equals 95000 + 5500 ish = 100500 ish headcount

Layoff 8000 ish employees and contractors

100500-8000 equals 92500-ish plus

It's all p-ish

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hrl+H2HtDCo

Because 8000 sounds much better in cost cutting terms as compared to 2000 in the eyes of the shareholders and any potential investors!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hnm+H2HtDCo

they all went mad:) you dont 'lay off' contractors because they're on contract and you decide to renew their contract or not. PK is full of it and that stupid BD couldn't tell or chose to ignore

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gcs+H2HtDCo

I agree, below PK announcement on contract works as permanent workers was odd to me. I don't understand why a company would speak of this. "We laid off 5,500 contract workers and labeled them as permanent employees with the others". What?????

"this is the weirdest, why re-classify "the company reclassified 5,500 contractors as permanent employees, so the overall reduction was 8,000 employees?"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xbx+H2HtDCo

Maybe if they didn't have three freaking headquarters (two of them practically next door to each other) SLB's costs wouldn't be so high.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1icl+H2HtDCo

20k?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dkj+H2HtDCo

Lets not try to understand PK's logic, everything he has touch while in SLB went to sh--s and cleanup crew called after him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ryi+H2HtDCo

or simply to project his power and status, look at me I am second to none, I made the difficult decision to screw these many employees, I deserve more options

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nkk+H2HtDCo

Must have given those contractors severance if they reclassified them as permanent employees. Pretty generous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vdk+H2HtDCo

this is the weirdest, why re-classify "the company reclassified 5,500 contractors as permanent employees, so the overall reduction was 8,000 employees"?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uzg+H2HtDCo

Post a reply

: