Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Andy Grove is dead; Tick-Tock is dead

Is Intel going to spring for an epic wake?

by
| 1164 views | | 7 replies (last March 27, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+GxW9OFC

7 replies (most recent on top)

all he did was force shift value to f---ing apartheid illegitimate gang called israel......10 billion $ to go to 10nm there.....absolutely no logic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5boq+GxW9OFC

Only the paranoid survive...nevermind.

A.S. Grove

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mxl+GxW9OFC

Yes, Intel is now the opposite of Andy Gove's "paranoid" - it is complacent. Intel does need another Andy Grove to survive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kos+GxW9OFC

Andy Grove may have been an a--hole at times, but he was so in the "Steve Jobs" vein: brilliant and incisive, and yes arrogant. But Andy deserved to be arrogant. He was a visionary, and all the CEOs that came after him look pathetic. Andy Grove moved Intel out of memory and into processors. Compare that to the legacy of the other CEOs: Barrett's 26 company buying binge at the height of the dot.com bubble, Ottellini entirely missing the rise of the cell phone, and now BK putting chips down on drones and IOT, a market Intel has already lost. Andy was a true visionary and Intel badly needs another Andy. RIP Andy Grove.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iot+GxW9OFC

Have some respect.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ibu+GxW9OFC

FK Andy Grove and Intel

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @guw+GxW9OFC

Intel is dead :) Andy was an A^$ hole. Good thing he is dead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pih+GxW9OFC

Post a reply

: