Thread regarding IBM layoffs

Layoffs Next Week

From: http://govtslaves.info/report-ibm-employees-bracing-massive-layoff-starting-next-week/

(DH Kass) Last October, IBM (IBM) chief executive Ginni Rometty vaguely hinted the company’s self-styled makeover to analytics, cloud, mobile and security specialist could mean yet another round of layoffs, following last year’s firing of 10,000 workers with another 1,700 shown the door in 2013.

But that was small potatoes compared to what might hit IBM next week amid one report the vendor is prepping to lay off what could amount to 26 percent of its global workforce. If events play out as a Forbes report by noted IBM watcher Robert X. Cringely outlines, by the end of February some 100,000 IBM workers could be gone.

If enacted, the layoffs would arrive timed to a major corporate reorganization codenamed Project Chrome ending IBM’s hardware, software and service silo history and creating new business units for Research, Sales & Delivery, Systems, Global Technology Services, Cloud, Watson, Security, Commerce and Analytics. IBM’s 11th consecutive quarter of declining revenue might have triggered the vendor to initiate the far-reaching reorganization, said in some circles to be IBM’s largest overhaul in its 103-year history.

At this point, the rumors are flying fast and loose with no confirmation one way or another from IBM or from employees.

Lance Crosby, Softlayer founder and chief executive, is said to have resigned, according to a post at Alliance@IBM, an employee forum. Another poster wrote, “I know for a fact that in my organization (within GTS Services Delivery) my team was targeted with 20% cuts across the board.” And another wrote, “Sounds a lot like Cingely’s 26% is well over the limit, but that does not mean zero layoffs. Be prepared, this is typically the quarter where many heads are chopped.”

Taken at face value, the rumored layoff numbers seem out-sized. For IBM to fire one-quarter of its workforce adds up to potentially getting rid of 100,000 people in one swipe. That hardly seems possible. And it flies counter to IBM chief financial officer Martin Schroeder’s comment on an IBM earnings call last week that the vendor won’t “replicate the same level of restructuring as we did last year.”

By Cringely’s assessment, the Project Chrome-associated firings will affect many of IBM’s worldwide services operations both in the U.S. and other regions of the world. In particular, IBM reportedly will enact deep cuts to its mainframe and storage operations in the U.S., the report said.

With Project Chrome designed to improve IBM’s sagging financials for the next few quarters, the vendor is said to want to stay ahead of business losses in its Global Technology Services business and other units.

“The size of Project Chrome cuts suggest IBM is trying to get three or four quarters ahead of the expected business losses,” Cringely wrote. “At this point, IBM’s business losses have become a self-fulfilling process with deep cuts followed by increasingly bad service, increasingly madder customers, and more lost business.”

The picture of IBM gloom and doom Cringely paints is striking. Project Chrome, he wrote, “will traumatize the corporation and put most accounts into immediate crisis…If you are an IBM customer you should probably start working on plans to keep your projects moving forward and your systems running. If you are an investor or Wall Street analyst it’s time to take a closer look at IBM’s messaging.”

The report doesn’t point to any hard evidence, not only to support claims of the rumored layoffs but also to substantiate much of the Project Chrome references. And, without that what we have is opinion, prescient opinion, perhaps, but opinion, nonetheless.

Still, according to employee and contractor posts at the Alliance@IBM website, some layoff activity already has begun. One 25-year, Global Business Services employee posted about receiving a low performance rating, followed by a severance package offer. Others reported similar actions.

“I, too, received a PBC 3 (low employee performance) rating on Thursday (which didn’t surprise me),” the employee wrote. “I’m in GBS. I was told that the final decision as to who would receive a 3 wasn’t made until late on Wednesday. The separation package I have been offered includes 13 weeks of severance pay and one year of medical (since I have more than 25 years with IBM). It’s called a ‘minimized separation allowance.’ I have 30 days to accept.”

by
| 1492 views | | 6 replies (last April 2, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+GHqKdKH

6 replies (most recent on top)

I am confused by this article, the timeline is odd

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dht+GHqKdKH

Lance Crosby left SoftLayer in January 2015.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cth+GHqKdKH

Headcount is a tricky thing when it comes to IBM. Throughout 2000s we would lay off 200 engineers, and bring on board 220 payroll and HR specialists through outsourcing deals. We'd cut 24 testers in Rochester, but hire 30 in Pune. You get the math, more stuff is going off-shore (low cost areas) and high quality jobs are bing replaced by less value-add but more cash-flow-seady-and-predictable BP and IT outsourcing deals.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wva+GHqKdKH

Actually it did happen (and it's still happening, unless you are in total denial). IBM did cut as many as he said or more. The difference was made up with new employees through acquisitions, who were added but of course just more soylent green fodder to be cut at a later date.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgz+GHqKdKH

This cringe-worthy Cringely article is several years old. It didn't happen then and it's not about to happen now. A bad attempt at April Fool's humour...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jdo+GHqKdKH

This article references Cringely article written on January 22nd, quoting "by the end of February some 100,000 IBM workers could be gone." It's already April. This seems to be a continuation of the rumor that 1/3 of IBMers are getting laid off. Not sure why this is being written about again in April, but this article is citing old news.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @stt+GHqKdKH

Post a reply

: