Thread regarding National Oilwell Varco Inc. layoffs

Houston federal jury clears National Oilwell Varco in employment lawsuit

HOUSTON -- A Houston federal jury this week returned a verdict in favor of National Oilwell Varco, finding no wrongdoing in an employment discrimination lawsuit filed by eight African Americans who sought $120 million in damages.

Houston-based NOV, an oilfield equipment supplier, argued that these employees were not treated differently because of their race. The jury heard 12 days of testimony in the trial before Judge Lee H. Rosenthal in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

The plaintiffs were represented by high-profile civil rights lawyer Angela M. Alioto of San Francisco's Law Offices of Mayor Joseph L. Alioto and Angela Alioto in their claims of racial discrimination, hostile work environment and retaliation. Their lawsuit alleged that non-African-Americans got raises and promotions that were denied to the plaintiffs, in addition to claiming that racial slurs were frequently used in the workplace. However, the jury found that NOV had not violated the rights of the plaintiffs, seven former NOV employees and one current NOV employee.

NOV's trial team was led by special trial counsel John Zavitsanos of Houston's Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing P.C., or AZA. He offered evidence that showed there were several non-discriminatory reasons some of the workers did not receive promotions, were not asked to return to their jobs after taking unauthorized leave or were fired for cause.

Zavitsanos said, "NOV always has promoted a diverse workplace where discrimination isn't tolerated. This was nothing more than an attempt by a discrimination law firm to pull out a playbook that has worked in other cases in hopes of cashing in."

Also representing NOV along with Zavitsanos were attorneys Monique Gougisha Doucette and Christopher E. Moore of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart's New Orleans office. Assisting on the case was law school graduate Nathan Campbell, who is not yet licensed to practice law.

The plaintiffs in Vital, et al. v. National Oilwell Varco, No. 4:12-cv-01357, included former NOV employees Junious Vital, DeWarren Bellard, Damon Darby, Herbert Heard, Edward Jiles, Jerome Johnson, David Lane and current employee Billy Rose.

by
| 2061 views | | 21 replies (last October 24, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+DUmTBUr

21 replies (most recent on top)

Fox v. NOV

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dfHV+DUmTBUr

Wrongful termination

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @doBx+DUmTBUr

Wrongful death action

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0LY+DUmTBUr

Defendant: national oilwell varco and plaintif: randy rogers -- case: mr rogers alleges that he was unlawfully discriminated against because of his race, caucasian and that he was retaliated against for contacting the human resource department or for engaging in this protective activity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dJ9V+DUmTBUr

It's the covert machiaviallism managers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4Vzc+DUmTBUr

WOW. And I thought the company I work for was bad. NOV must be a horrible company to work for or is it the people they have in management that's ruining NOV. I'm thankful to be working for a great company, Schlumberger. I'm glad I don't work for NOV.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wI3+DUmTBUr

Eagle Ford Shale wrongful death lawsuit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qfR+DUmTBUr

Former employees of national oilwell varco shouldn't have to move to nebraska just to work for a competitir, a jury ruled. A jury in Harris county state district judge patricia hancock's court found that A&B Valve and Piping Systems and four of its employees had not stolen secrets from its larger competitor, national oilwell varco and had not engaged in unfair competition against the larger company. National oilwell varco filed the lawsuit claiminh four employees hired away when louisiana based A&B Valve opened for business in Houston could only stay in the oil equipment sales business if they went go work for a competitor in Nebraska or farther away. Juror tamara bobbitt said some of the jurirs were outraged at the larger company's argument. She said it claimed common information like pricing was unusual enough that employees could not legally get another job in the indistry without revealing trade secrets. The overall feeling was they didnt want employees to go, and if you tried to leave, they want you married to the company. Its president said it laid off, an ex-employee should reasonably be expected to move to nebraska if they wanted to stay in the same business, Bobbitt said. The jury verdict was awesome. It sent a message to big companies not to file frivolous lawsuits and allos us to get back to work. Clay Williams a spokesman for NOV said that the company will bit comment on the suit. People have a constitutional right in Texas to leave their place of employment and go to the competition. If there is no enployment contract offering compensation for a noncompete agreement, Texans may seek better employment. It's the pursuit of happiness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2LkK+DUmTBUr

Anon177294: why the aggression? Childhood or layoff issues maybe.

What i meant is that asking a sales person to lock that account is foul. Not that the post is foul. Chill and EAT SHIT TOO!!! But before that, you need anger management classes!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @22aj+DUmTBUr

Williams individually and on behalf of others similarily situated filed suit July 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division against National Oilwell Varco. A coroporate counsel for the company confirmed Williams had not been hired due to his conviction. Although NOV was tild that its reason for refusing Williams's application violated Title VII, it continued to refuse to hire him, the suit states.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2uOL+DUmTBUr

Anon 177225 and neither is the original post so what!s your point? That's foul? That's the kind of people NOV enjoys keeping around while the good ones are let go.All these cases are true and did happen regardless of layoffs or not. Look 'em up. There are a whole lot more case against NOV that weren't mentioned here. The original post opened a can of worms now you don't like it? Eat shit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2TLY+DUmTBUr

http://setexasrecord.com/stories/510641058-national-oilwell-varco-sued-over-alleged-unpaid-overtime

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ttG+DUmTBUr

To "lock down that account"?

That's foul.

Btw, most of these cases are not current. I mean, with the ongoing layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ilM+DUmTBUr

Defendant: National Oilwell Varco - U.S. district court southern district of texas, houston division

No. H-11-3390.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eQB+DUmTBUr

www.courthousenews.com/2013/08/01/59918.htm ;;;;; A former sales rep for National Oilwell Varco can proceed with claims that her manager told her to let a client's employee perform oral sex on her to "lock down that account," a federal judge ruled. U.S. District judge A. Richard Caputo of the Middle District of Pennsylvania rejected the company's motion to dismiss a complaint filed by former administrative assistant E. Crooks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18RQ+DUmTBUr

Feb 2015 - A texas federal judge tossed a national oilwell varco infringement suit against Omron Oilfield & Marine inc over an automatic drilling system patent, ruling NOV failed to sort out the "mess" it made over which corporate entity actually owned the patent. U.S. District judge Sam Sparks dismissed thexsuit with prejudice finding NOV's lawyers had been making inconsistent statements for years in various lawsuits concerning the patent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kTl+DUmTBUr

Caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1689463.html ,,,, jan 14, 2015

Sexual harassment case. Driesse filed a sexual harassment suit against national oilwell varco and won.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1N0Y+DUmTBUr

http://northtexaslegalnews.com/2015/07/19/its-all-fun-and-games-until-an-old-fart-files-an-age-discrimination-lawsuit-a-lesson-for-employers-from-the-fifth-circuit/ .......july 2015, a former national oilwell varco of 17 years tenure with national oilwell varco filed a lawsuit against national oilwell varco for discrimination and won. Of course, while an employer can provide employment dicrimination training to its employees, it cannot guarantee that all employees will follow it. However, employers can do two things, which NOV did not do, to minimize litigation. First, emloyers should never ignore discrimination complaints, however, small or petty they might seem at the time they are made. Had HR conducted the investigation and reprimanded or warned the supervisor about the inappropriate age comments, NOV might have avoided going to court. Second, if a company has a progressive discipline policy , it should apply such policy in a consistent and uniform manner. When it comes to discrimination claims, not having a progressive discipline policy is almost better thab having one that is applied arbitrarily.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1g95+DUmTBUr

A Houston federal jury has ordered National Oilwell Varco to pay more than $3 million to a former employee who says he was fired after complaining to company officials about racial discrimination he experienced from a supervisor. A court filing Monday says the two sides then reached a settlement for an undisclosed sum. /... http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/05/19/national-oilwell-varco-ordered-to-pay-fired-welder-in-discrimination-retaliation-suit/#15151101=0

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1crw+DUmTBUr

Smh....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sm6+DUmTBUr

WOW

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lnw+DUmTBUr

Post a reply

: