Things can't be going that great at gf, right? SJ was hard to please, but at least he was clueful and could make decisions.
11 replies (most recent on top)
Anonymous118709: Best advice I've seen so far. When the fire starts, those who dance close to the exit, make it out. Those who dance farther from the exit get trampled to death. Those who dance farthest from the exit get burned alive.
It is way too late for that. For the few/handful of good, decent people who still work for Qualcomm here is my advice: Dance close to the exit at the party.
Just have to lead the market, stop reacting to the voices n noises when those take you of the main course
sm should claim responsibility for failure and help mr take over to bring back the glory days of sj
Folks past success is no guarantee for future success... Board should do thorough due diligence and search for suitable CEO suitable to run company in current business environment. SM was put in as CEO in rush by board overnight to cover PJ's ass during his nasty divorce and did not do due diligence search...my 2 cents
Irwin Jacobs needs to return. If not, we should all quit before the ship sinks.
SJ was did good past. Now its different with different challenges, SJ has no other big achievements under his belt other than in qualcomm when it was mid size company....however we should be able to do better than SM....SM seems to be puppet CEO.
If SJ have the balls to take $1.00 pay I am all in. In the other hand the boards of directos welcome him with a $60M welcome RSU package vested in 3Y , S&M gets $50M "severance" (aka golden parachute) I really don't see what us the employees are going to gain back buy a new king.
Before proposing to bring back SJ to qualcomm to replace S&M you need to wonder what has happened to Motorola hanset division. Sure SJ pocketed millions with the sale of Moto, where and what is Moto Y2015? Shouldn't MOTO capture 90% of the high end smartphone market by now? ... SJ is a legend of the past
......
Sanjay Jha was the best thing to happen to Qualcomm. He used to define the market, not like RM/SM who follow it (read mediatek). His loss and then Qualcomm decline started
Don't know about that. From what I understand, the current slave-driving culture started with him