Thread regarding Target Corp. layoffs

Read up on the Federal WARN notice

There's quite a bit of speculation here which may or may not be true, but WARN is real and relevant here

by
| 801 views | | 10 replies (last March 6, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+AnlLl1n

10 replies (most recent on top)

Minnesota had a low employment rate! 😢

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nEj+AnlLl1n

This makes me feel a bit better. If worst case is 60 days still on payroll and then 6 week severance package, that's 3.5 months to find a new job before taking the hit in pay on unemployment. Luckily MN has a low unemployment rate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zjT+AnlLl1n

This law firm specializes in breaches of WARN - if a few of us reach out to them they would consider applying pressure: http://www.girardgibbs.com/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7rY+AnlLl1n

My understanding is 45 days is paid out as usual, I.e. Biweekly and 60 days is a lump sum

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nKg+AnlLl1n

Is the WARN + severance given as a lump sum? Or paid out bi-weekly as normal?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oGB+AnlLl1n

The 60 days on payroll is WARN. It's not negated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @PCy+AnlLl1n

Exactly - they typically give 9 weeks = 63 days = no WARN problems.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lSw+AnlLl1n

Isn't that why they give 60 days + additional severance to departing tm's to cover the 60 day part.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kE5+AnlLl1n

*negate

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v6L+AnlLl1n

If they provide you with 60 days on payroll, like they did with US based Canada tms, this would negated WARN.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ZWK+AnlLl1n

Post a reply

: