Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Toxic Chevron

Chevron is such a toxic place now. It's a shell of the company it once was before MW came into power. He should be ashamed of himself wrecking once was a great place to work. The board needs to fire MW and MN while we still have a company left. Otherwise sell it off as it doesn't deserve to operate any longer. Like others have said its tough to get up in the morning to deal with all this. It might be too late at this point....

by
| 2301 views | | 12 replies (last November 25, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vzxcpw3

12 replies (most recent on top)

The more we slim down the greater the stock price premium Esso will pay and MW will meet his personal goal of $500 million compensation as CEO, beating many others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6axf+1vzxcpw3

@huv+1vzxcpw3
Skinny down to sell to Exxon?.
When Exxon acquires Chevron, it will clean house. Basically, most Chevron lifers could not exist in an Exxon produce meaningfully or die universe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5kjl+1vzxcpw3

Agree with the post. Chevron has had zero strategy besides higher returns and lower carbon and very little management effort to shape execution of the vague strategy. Appears the strategy has been 'follow whatever our competitors are doing.' See the lame green strategy and buying in to Exxon's Guyana success. Stock should be way higher than current if we had competent leadership and a decent strategy. Employees and technology have driven success in the past, now efficient execution of capital treadmill efforts like shale extraction are driving success. Very hard to compete with and differentiate yourself from independents in this game. Wall Street is voting with their sell buttons.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tvo+1vzxcpw3

You should change to a different BU or go expat. Plenty of fun stuff to work on everyday in our group.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fuh+1vzxcpw3

I bet Exxon picks us up after we slim down next year. Maybe that's why we are reducing so much.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @huv+1vzxcpw3

“staff reductions = more work/stress”

Let’s get real, CVX is overstaffed and there are a bunch of folks doing nothing. Major reduction needs to happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @abo+1vzxcpw3

money funneling upwards to management and out to shareholders

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ygr+1vzxcpw3

Let’s recap:

  • fewer promotions
  • small to no raises
  • smaller bonuses
  • staff reductions = more work/stress
  • reorgs to nowhere

This place is a sinking ship, and we’re all just rearranging the deck chairs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgu+1vzxcpw3

This is the correct answer

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cif+1vzxcpw3

Retired, but please do tell what they survey saids!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dlh+1vzxcpw3

What do the CES results say?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bas+1vzxcpw3

Have you seen the CES results? Yikes…seems people are finally being honest

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tlb+1vzxcpw3

Post a reply

: