Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

two people

David Zinsner with Michelle H. investor conference as co-CEOs

David" "But I think you're going to find us and this is kind of a characteristic of Michelle and I. We are a little bit more on a say-do basis. We're more likely to tell you things as they -- as we've kind of accomplished big milestones that are meaningful as opposed to early indications of success. So that's going to -- that's our philosophy. I think that's why the Board actually chose us to run the interim role because we are so transparent and operate in that way. And I think the investors can expect us to do that as we go through earnings calls and so forth."

interesting. lame a-s, incompetents now promoting themselves as say-do transparent...

by
| 2006 views | | 10 replies (last December 16, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vWM9tPd

10 replies (most recent on top)

D-mb + D-mber = D-mberest

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4nsz+1vWM9tPd

They despise Pat and always did but behind closed doors

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ygf+1vWM9tPd

If all you do is say, then you just have a pile of do do left over

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lmb+1vWM9tPd

Well Pat had a very high say, and if the rest of ELT had a very high do, wouldn't that lead to a high say-do ratio too?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kbr+1vWM9tPd

Juvenile behavior from 'interim' CEOs trying to take the helm. Be careful what you wish for....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1utu+1vWM9tPd

MJ is a pathological liar. I worked for her, saw one lie or difficult situation avoidance after another.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ych+1vWM9tPd

When your ex-boss is down, disown him.
Corporate loyalty at it's best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rhz+1vWM9tPd

I think he is trying to show how they won't be like the boastful Pat.

I believe that Pat was removed partly due to the magical thinking in his various statements about the companies prospects.

He clearly lied to customers about what Intel could deliver, resulting in a number of failed deals for IFS and Products.

D-mb Dave should be removed for cause, as he was either unable or unwilling to ground Pat and the Board on how out of control spending and Fab expansion had gotten.

ELT is trying to message that the real issue was out of control spending, and oh nevermind that Products can never get back what they lost when Foundry fell behind. That cash cow has left the barn and ain't coming back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oms+1vWM9tPd

Only-what-I-do-Is-Talking MJ and I-Cant-Predict-Earnings Dave should be kicked rather than Pat...

Well I hope for split pretty quick with new CEO for IFS. Then product will see how in deep they are.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nmd+1vWM9tPd

Really? Dave Should look at himself in the mirror and reflect on his track record before self-bolstering.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fhx+1vWM9tPd

Post a reply

: