A few posts here are referencing a hybrid email that was sent but I didn’t receive anything. Care to share who the audience is for the email and who sent it? Thanks!
10 replies (most recent on top)
Glad I didn't get that promotion this year.
Where’s DEI when you need it? The 26 and ups are being discriminated against. LOL.
Most of us have spent the last 5 years in some type of hybrid or WFH scenario. Prior to this I was in the field and worked in the field 5-6 days a week for 5 years, 9/80 did NOT exist. Prior to that 5+ years doing 9/80 in another US location. The company has been very generous versus our competitors or other industries.
oh damn… i moved to central California w half the price in bay area and coffee badging the whole time…. moving to plan B
Here is the email…
Official guidance:
Effective no earlier than June 1, 2025
- All PSG 26 and above employees will move to a minimum 4-day in-office hybrid work model. This will enable leaders to better collaborate with peers, mentor teams and ensure we are driving the highest priority outcomes for the enterprise.
- US-based employees on a 2-day hybrid work model will move to a minimum 3-day hybrid work model (primarily Finance, IT, and CSS).
- Updates related to international locations will follow local requirements and be communicated locally as appropriate. Global Service Centers excluded.
There is no change to US-based employees currently on a minimum 3-day in-office work model.
We are providing advanced notification of the changes to allow employees time to make needed arrangements to ensure compliance by the effective dates.
Supervisors will continue to monitor and ensure compliance monthly and will have direct engagements with employees not meeting expectations to determine next steps.
It will take the contributions of all of us, together, to strengthen our enterprise performance and deliver on industry leading performance.
I'm curious about the purpose of having the 26+ psgs come in 4 days a week sooner than the rest of the company. I have a couple ideas of why. Just like the person said below, making the higher ranked folks lead by example to set expectations for the lower ranked people.
My other idea is it's being done because they already planned to layoff higher psgs 1st to begin with and are using this as a 2 step system. Step 1: see which 26+ psgs resist coming in and lay them off. Step 2: use the laid off 26+ psgs as examples for what could happen to the lower level psgs to scare people back into the office.
Anyway, it's all just guesses at this point but that's where my thought process is leading me. It's perhaps too conspiracy theory-esk for this platform.
Chevron doesn't do everything right, but this move nails it... Leading from above through action. Showing that they're willing to make the sacrifice before asking that of the rank and file.
There's a lot of hypocrisy at Chevron and in the corporate world. Kudos to MW and team for flipping the script on this one.
It hilarious that so many of you think that you can continue indefinitely not working or working very little at all and stay on the payroll under the guise of wfh or hybrid!
The email I saw was sent to the O*G LT from MN and messaged that not all impacted so do not share broadly. It will be discussed with those in scope. All others on a two day will transition to 3 days.
If you didn't get it you don't need to worry about it.