Thread regarding Ford layoffs

The problem with our leadership is they are too reactionary

They have no vision. They just react to things as they are.

For instance, EVs. They believed the hype that the government would force everyone to them and went all in. They should know that government mandates never work and are subject to administrations changing. Toyota was smart by compromising with more hybrids. Us? We pivot to that after it's too late and billions are already spent.

Then there was the whole chip shortage, pinching inventory stuff. Jim comes out and says that the days of walking onto a dealer lot and buying existing inventory are over. From now on everyone will have to order a vehicle. Two years later we sit at 152 days of inventory on dealers lots. Nice prediction there Jim.

We need a leader that will be able to read the tea leaves and put a strategy in place for the future. We have none of that right now.

by
| 1030 views | | 10 replies (last November 29, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vFbBsk4

10 replies (most recent on top)

@1xuu+1vFbBsk4 most american companies must have rubber-stamp boards of directors. such foolishness would not get past sharp eyed board members. such as hiring Mr. Hackett. look at theranos. they blame "the girl," but she had a lot of "guys" on the board who were just approving things left and right, no questions asked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ppz+1vFbBsk4

Some of the CEO's at the top have bachelors degrees, others masters degrees. Not much different than some of us on this board today. At the end of the day, holding these pieces of paper while educated, doesn't necessarily translate into intellect or critical thinker. There are many people that sit on top of corporations that don't deserve to be there, yet because their name is known in particular circles not available to you and I, they somehow keep getting recycled for millions of dollars in salary and pension.

With that said, having vision works both ways. Having the vision to move forward, and knowing where the road blocks are. Sometimes it's a matter of an unstoppable force aligned against an immoveable object. The answer is avoidance, but few see it that way, because they can't see it any other way than moving forward.

The CEOs at the top has resources available to them that you and I would never have. They in theory, should be surrounded by people of incredible talent and intellect, that can advise them on potential courses of action. Brilliant people will struggle, but stupid people will still produce inadequate results. Is your company struggling? Ask yourself what kind of CEO is at the helm.

Most intellectuals and critical thinkers knew EV's were a losing game, at least this cycle, but what they don't know is they are a stepping stone into the future for the next attempt to push it forward. For that to happen, many companies in unison had to take on the brunt of a unified loss together. I simply dislike the concept of EV's and will resist them until the very end.

There's a reason why the big 3 are valued very different than Tesla. They've created a primitive automaker culture, and think the same way, yet they want to be treated like Teslas valuation. For this to happen, these companies need to sever their ICE business from their EV business. Some suppliers have done this already, and to their advantage. This in turn, may allow Wall Street to witness the conviction in their cause. They won't do this, because these companies want a backup, an extra source of income incase their plans for EV fail. Tesla on the other hand, is all in on EV's, as it's their only option. And it's priced in that way.

So, if these big 3 are failing, faltering, stumbling, then why shouldn't any random bachelor or masters degree candidate be allowed to step up and continue more of the same? Only, they'll do it at a fraction of the cost, and just maybe, one of them will do better than these supposedly valuable CEOs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2unc+1vFbBsk4

We had Chinese engineers working among us and we even sent a few to china. We even built an Explorer plant over there... What tools we were to believe any of the hype. Collecting my paycheck was more important than questioning our management team... Wait.... I always wrote something in my pulse survey that should have raised some questions.... he-l maybe that is why I was let go in 2022... Long live the lump sum... just thankful I had +30 yrs. A lot of folks did not.

Keep the HRA payments coming as they are probably on the future cutting block..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bsi+1vFbBsk4

They are just d-mb people. Worst of the worst.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ufu+1vFbBsk4

When I worked in PD I looked at Toyota as the benchmark. Quality and design for manufacturing.

Billy and Chris had wet dreams for EVs they Jumped the shark and probably ignored marketing and planning organizations.

10 billion down the cr-pper in 2 years. Amazing Billy hasn’t retired and Chris not fired. BOD are clueless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xuu+1vFbBsk4

@whs+1vFbBsk4 you're stupid. Doug the Tu-d is an "EV or bust" mo--n.

The American people have spoken. They'd rather have toothpicks under their fingernails than drive an EV.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mwx+1vFbBsk4

Not all of leadership is like what OP says. Case in point, Model e and DF. The work going on today will be a perfect match to the needs of our customers when the new Model e products and services are available to the public.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @whs+1vFbBsk4

for some reason the term "inconsistent" vomes to mind...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mss+1vFbBsk4

Agree. Always chasing the trend of today and delivering it or cancelling it 2 years after the trend is dead

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rba+1vFbBsk4

We are not even good at reacting. We’ve spend billions in China for years with no results AND let them walk right by us in technology as we watched. Suddenly our CEO says he had an epiphany when he drove a Chinese vehicle. LMAO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hei+1vFbBsk4

Post a reply

: