Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Wonder if they'll ever report demographics of who they sacked

Something tells me over 90% canned were straight, white, and male

by
| 2031 views | | 16 replies (last October 17, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1v2jBcs9

16 replies (most recent on top)

The guy who admitted to leaving Intel in 2001 is exactly who hangs out here... How can you be such a cyber stalker of a company you haven't worked at for 23 years. Obviously, Intel got it right with you. Right? Why are you so obsessed? Sounds like a GPTW!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kfr+1v2jBcs9

If you were one, OP, good riddance

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lwe+1v2jBcs9

Poor white males getting sc--wed..blah..blah..blah. Grow a sack and stop blaming others for your failures. P.S. I’m a white male too

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gvj+1v2jBcs9

When I signed the termination paperwork to get a package i agreed to not sue for age discrimination. That was in 2001. Legal and HR have only improved that protection. It doesn’t matter. Whoever buys Intel will have another 50% round of firings to eliminate duplication.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vpb+1v2jBcs9

They already had one class action lawsuit for age discrimination for the last mass layoff; so now they do "performance and skill assessments". Which like another poster said in another thread, having a preferred skin color or background nets you extra points. So you really have to be bad to get below that line. If you don't have the preferred DEI soft skill then you have to be that much better to keep your job and/or get promoted/good rating.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ebs+1v2jBcs9

doesn't matter anyway. Anybody taking any of the packages needs to sign an agreement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gxw+1v2jBcs9

@yzr+1v2jBcs9

You are giving them WAY too much credit. They are more reactive then proactive

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @khb+1v2jBcs9

Don't be silly. This isn't their first rodeo, they aren't that stupid to slip up regarding demographics and risk a class action. Legal teams have probably been carefully calculating that for weeks, making sure it's an age, gender, and racial mix.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yzr+1v2jBcs9

OP, you forgot to add old or at least long term employee. If your salary is too high you are at risk. Skills and experience don't matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bss+1v2jBcs9

In Oregon you step out side it's 90% white people. You join an engineering meeting at Intel it's 10. That says something

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @upl+1v2jBcs9

I was wondering the same thing. Everyone I known and have seen is a white male age ranges.

@kaz+1v2jBcs9

Ha no they won’t! As transparent as they claim to be this type of data. They play close to the chest. Asked them for something simpler like what is the demographic breakdown of first line managers? See what response you will get.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ria+1v2jBcs9

Adding from my small DCAI group ISPs
40s/White/Male
50s//White/Male
20s/White/Male
20s/Indian/Male

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kks+1v2jBcs9

From SMG... small sample size I personally know:

VSP=50s/White/Male, 50s/Asian/Female, 40s/White/Male, 40s/White/Female, 40s/White/Female, 30s/White/Female/LGBTQ, 40s/Latino/Male, 40s/Latino/Male

ISP=50s/White/Male, 50s/Latino/Male, 30s/Latino/Male, 40s/White/Female

All U.S. based.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tnd+1v2jBcs9

You can get it fairly easily. But it will not be given to you unless there is a legal requirement to do so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cpw+1v2jBcs9

They'll email us all

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kaz+1v2jBcs9

What a troll

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @drf+1v2jBcs9

Post a reply

: