Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

BoD next week - will Pat be fired?

Upvote this post if you think Pat should be fired ASAP

by
| 3481 views | | 34 replies (last September 10, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1un8DkZL

34 replies (most recent on top)

Please

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ooz+1un8DkZL

PG-13 rated !
Fire all the x86 Legacy ELTs !
No more MBAs in control !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jtw+1un8DkZL

Did anyone confirm the board is meeting this week and not next?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ylk+1un8DkZL

Wow 78 upvotes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ugm+1un8DkZL

Pat is almost hang on the rope, not the problem is they could not find somebody to take the role from him. Nobody want to be intel CEO now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jmi+1un8DkZL

Anyone else think there is something going on behind the scenes with the recent board member resignation

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fve+1un8DkZL

Pat should have risen the ranks like he did. We need to stop similar Jabronis from rising up as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ghj+1un8DkZL

Firing Pat is a decision left for the December board meeting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ryz+1un8DkZL

@1gjr+1un8DkZL

Orrr, the board / CEO could be trying to pull a Sears (headed by Edward Lampert, iirc). Drive the price so far down, they could take it private and sell off the parts they don't want.

Fruit for thought.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ccm+1un8DkZL

Why they ever hired this buffoon is beyond me. The fact that they keep giving him multi-million dollar raises for tanking everything he touches is even more bewildering. His job must be to take the stock down to absolute rock bottom so Intel can be bought and sold for parts....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gjr+1un8DkZL

probably the BOD is behind Pat in this whole saga

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fzy+1un8DkZL

Pat should be fired, but he won't. Why? Because the BoD won't be able to find someone willing to take the job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mno+1un8DkZL

“Who is the lo-ser who keeps post this BS: “
[@bid+1un8DkZL]

You?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wtw+1un8DkZL

Sell the majority of stake mobileye and focus on recovery.Be honest with everyone no more bs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1adf+1un8DkZL

Elon musk or Jeff bezos will save us

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1loq+1un8DkZL

People defending Pat and thinking that he should get 1-2 more years… I don’t think you understand the reality – Intel doesn’t have one to two more years. Intel barely has six months left. Intel will not survive in its current shape and form for more than six months. Pat completely destroyed the company and eliminated any chances of its revival. every extra day that Pat stays on a CEO is one day lost in the chance to fix intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ats+1un8DkZL

Flashback to May 2023
https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2023/01/intel-reports-steep-decline-in-sales-poor-outlook.html

“Clearly the financials aren’t what we hoped for,” CEO Pat Gelsinger told Wall Street analysts on a conference call, acknowledging that the company’s results and outlook “are below what we expect of ourselves.”
“We’re confident with the strategic outlook we have for our business,” Gelsinger said.

Pat is STILL spewing the same BS.
Still confident in this carnival clown?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rap+1un8DkZL

Nominate PG the "Father of IDM2.0" for his god damned legacy!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wdb+1un8DkZL
Asking him to leave now would be premature.

The company is under extreme financial duress. Intel won’t survive the next few years with the current situation and cash burn.

Someone else needs to take over and stop the bleeding. Take the losses and move onto smaller ambitions.

Pat still thinks it’s 1999.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zuk+1un8DkZL

Semiconductor turnaround/decisions take 5+ years to pan out. My guess is he will be given 1-2 more years and until the results on PTL on 18A is demonstrated (for better or worse). If things looks good next year (no schedule slips, 18A is ready one time) and 1 or 2 customers have signed up by then, he will continue. Otherwise, new CEO.

The new CEO will not have any better strategy but to break up the company. Asking him to leave now would be premature. Just my personal opinion. So probably the best course is to downsize, sell non-core assets to raise cash to pay down debt, and buy time for another 1-2 years. At the same time, cutting/trimming product teams to fund foundry is not a winning strategy either. Intel does have a winner in LNL and PTL must be better than LNL/ARL (higher value proposition) to continue the momentum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ror+1un8DkZL

What about Jensen? Could he be the one to take the one great semiconductor giant back to greatness? It would be a great way to cement his legacy in the same breath as Noyce, Moore, Grove, Barrett, Otellini, Krzanich, Swan and Gelsinger.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iru+1un8DkZL

Pat has zero excuses. He has been CEO for 3.5 years. 14 quarters. He has lied to the board and the employees and to the shareholders every single earnings call. He should be fired and indicted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ynd+1un8DkZL

The board member who recently stepped down is probably the best person to become the next ceo. He is the only one who had the courage to step down when the rest of the board refused to act.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pcv+1un8DkZL

Who would you replace him with??
Name a Rockstar that can save the day!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mrw+1un8DkZL

How can board take action? They are worst of the worst. They were not picked on merit but based color of skin and gender. Diversity only means race and gender. Nothing to do with diversity of ideas, poverty,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tbe+1un8DkZL

There is a law in business. No business survives 4 bad CEOs. PG is number 4.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nhv+1un8DkZL

For anyone making excuses for Pat, understand this. Yes, the mess was a long time coming, but he is the CEO now and has been less then truthful with everyone about the state of the business.

This is very disturbing in the light of how much they pushed "Truth and Transparency", both of which they have failed miserably at. Does Pat need to be fired - maybe. I would much rather see the board cut his and the ELT's salary back to $1 and claw back the 180 mil package he received. This will never happen, though, as the board has no spine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kzm+1un8DkZL

Vanguard wants action now. They have a large portion of the shares.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tgc+1un8DkZL

Who is the lo-ser who keeps post this BS: https://www.tekinsil.com/SemiconductorsBill/US_Semiconductor_Bill.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bid+1un8DkZL

For @fqm
Yes, Intel started getting mismanagement since Craig Barrett Became a CEO. When becoming Chairman and Otellinni became CEO, they missed mobile/flash businesses and laid off 10,500 employees.
https://www.tekinsil.com/SemiconductorsBill/US_Semiconductor_Bill.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @znz+1un8DkZL

The board will just shower him with praises on the cost cutting he is doing. Bunch of nitwits

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @njb+1un8DkZL

Is the meeting definitely next week? I mean, the week after is also mid-September...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ado+1un8DkZL

Pat will get another life. But we all know fate shall be determined when dice stops rolling, 18A that is

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oqo+1un8DkZL

This isn’t solely on Pat, it’s on the last 5 CEOs. Don’t think he gets fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fqm+1un8DkZL

Post a reply

: