Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Layoffs end of this week and next

Layoffs - Large and wide. It was pushed back because of Yammer post of employee telling all those impacted to contact their local news organization about the constant cuts. Now that has died down expect more cuts.

by
| 2691 views | | 13 replies (last October 14, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uSqEltp

13 replies (most recent on top)

Did anyone get a screen grab of the post?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7uqi+1uSqEltp

The mentioned tax incentives vary largely by state. For USB in the Midwest atleast, the tax incentives are regional based, not butts in seats based at office ABC. Meaning they get tax incentives for remote employees too where they have the largest presence in MN and WI. Nice try though

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ith+1uSqEltp

Cities and states offer tax incentives to have employees in the office. Who offers tax incentives for employees to work remote? No one. As each in office employee resigns, they will force other remote employee back in the office to reach their tax credit goals.

I’d be worried if I was remote even though I’m a firm believer in remote work. USB is desperate to save money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iwn+1uSqEltp

"There’s employees that live within a commutable distance and were not assigned a hub today while there peers were. Perhaps they were not assigned to a hub because they will be getting laid off. Sound logical?"

Yes, if we think in a straight forward manner. But that's not at play here. You've got to think like a psychopath. The whole premise of RTO is to squeeze certain employees to voluntarily resign from their jobs. Looking from that angle I'd say those NOT assigned to a hub are safer than those assigned to a hub.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vee+1uSqEltp

Would love to see my manager on the list this week

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vqz+1uSqEltp

There’s employees that live within a commutable distance and were not assigned a hub today while there peers were. Perhaps they were not assigned to a hub because they will be getting laid off. Sound logical?

"Will those that remain remote be the first to be laid off?"

I'm unable to follow this logic. While being remote might lean towards it I doubt that it IS the reason for a lay off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bjh+1uSqEltp

Get your bingo cards ready 😜

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mpm+1uSqEltp

"Will those that remain remote be the first to be laid off?"

I'm unable to follow this logic. While being remote might lean towards it I doubt that it IS the reason for a lay off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bgn+1uSqEltp

Any particular roles in Wealth Management?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eea+1uSqEltp

Wealth management layoffs this Thursday, right before the sales meeting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uhb+1uSqEltp

A nice bank run would be in order.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bmk+1uSqEltp

Today employees in many markets were notified that they would be RTO. Will those that remain remote be the first to be laid off?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pus+1uSqEltp

Someone made a Yammer post on the USB intranet? That's pretty brazen. I thank whoever it was for leaking. So that means layoffs are pushed up one week early? It was previously reported on here that Layoffs would happen on Oct 18th and again on Nov 15th. I missed the Yammer post. Which areas are impacted?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @una+1uSqEltp

Post a reply

: