Can someone honestly explain the logic?
7 replies (most recent on top)
Come on…….this company always shuffles things around during “major” succession planning to justify to the BOD the “broadening” of leadership experience and associated PSGs. This is always a sure sign……..
To justify c-suite pay levels they have to shuffle the reporting responsibilities. It really doesn’t matter to the regular level cogs
The logic is really easy to understand. Original move was all agreed upon with the old CIO staying in place. That changed, so new regime (even before fully taking over) made the change they preferred. Simple as.
The Chevron way refers to job protection through the creation and defence of little empires. Activity, as opposed to productive work, is one of the best ways to achieve this aim.
It’s simple —
Exxon put their IT ad part of their CTC. It’s our playbook -Copy Exxon.
Something to do with a massive budget overrun by IT?
You’d have to ask whatever management consulting company told them to do it. Probably the same ones that foisted the chapter model on IT, laughing all the way to the bank.