Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Does anybody still think Cisco is too big to fail?

by
| 1044 views | | 7 replies (last August 19, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1u5aF1F2

7 replies (most recent on top)

Cisco gear is for national security, long live Cisco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nyw+1u5aF1F2

Kodak was too big to fail

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvx+1u5aF1F2

If Cisco wants to remain relevant, they need to do what Steve Jobs did at Apple in the 1990's.

Trim the fat, get rid of departments that aren't producing core products. Stop trying to be everything to everyone. Focus on core products only. All board members and ELT who do not share this vision need to be forced out.

Yes it will mean horrible LR's and massive restructuring but once the dust is settled, Cisco would be a much better company and more enjoyable place to work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pyy+1u5aF1F2

To big to fail isn't real, but size can help hold over periods when competitors have a better product. The thing is, you actually have to respond to those competitors with a better product instead of shoving your head in the sand and insists you're actually better

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jxn+1u5aF1F2

Now, the issue right now is, Cisco is so small, very easy to fail at anytime.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aqj+1u5aF1F2

Definitely not too big to fail. It can all go wrong very quickly, and it is doing. Another year and company is fu---d.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zax+1u5aF1F2

Nope.. its looking like a lot of these big tech companies are a lot more fragile than they think.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qhu+1u5aF1F2

Post a reply

: