customers were complaining that they couldn't make or receive calls. If they did make calls, had to call back numerous times due to the poor quality of the calls. This type of incident is occurring all too frequently and has to stop!
11 replies (most recent on top)
Over 100 cell sites supported by an access provider’s network.
What could go wrong?
It's all about AT&T's sweetheart relationship with convicted criminal, Ericsson.
Legg is not just a terrible person, but he’s bad luck too.
"Another AT&T Mobility today outage in northern Phoenix, AZ,"
I believe Stink flew over Phoenix. He ignored the MOP that he should not using the bowling ball polisher on his head while in flight! The EMP is devastating!
Whenever a company wants to not do something, hire a vendor and avoid blame. False marketing claims, guaranteed time to cancel without any cost, or lifetime feature subject to change without notice. But price is fixed or will increase.
Not our fault, no refund.
“Regardless, it is AT&Ts service that people pay for (not Crowdstrike) and the customer does not give a rat's a-s what part of the service is not working. It is ultimately AT&T that is not working. AT&T designed the network and approved the vendor.”
But I’m a top performer.
"This one's not on AT&T. There was a massive global outage caused by CrowdStrike."
Yeah, an outage in one specific area of the country is due to a global problem with an outside vendor, and not AT&T. I have not read about Verizon or TMobil having this issue in AZ!
Regardless, it is AT&Ts service that people pay for (not Crowdstrike) and the customer does not give a rat's a-s what part of the service is not working. It is ultimately AT&T that is not working. AT&T designed the network and approved the vendor.
This one's not on AT&T. There was a massive global outage caused by CrowdStrike.
Who can guess what the cause was?
SOS