Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Stankey vs The Employees

Since he's taken office as CEO, John Stankey has been at war with the employee base at AT&T. At every turn he has stripped employees of any and all benefits that he legally can. He has not acted in good faith with unions. He created a RTO policy that from the beginning was a way to reduce workforce and minimize payout of severance. He has made sure to fly under the radar of the Warn Act (though NJ caught him!). Now, rumor has it that there are mass employee reductions for 2nd half of 2024. How? By another "RTO relocation of jobs" that are already in hubs such as Atlanta and New Jersey, moving to Dallas. Note: relocation of jobs, not people. Of course, that has been the new HR buzzword, which is atrocious: 'we move (or remove) jobs, not people". By firing employees whenever possible for COBC violation because they don't work 8+ hours in a massively overcrowded customer cell drop-in centers called 'offices' where even on a low employee count day such as Friday there's a constant, steady din of Microsoft Teams meetings penetrating the air and causing stifling noise pollution. Perhaps, Mr. Stankey, they go home or to another site where the employee can actually think, perform, and work unlike the zoo called Dallas. or Atlanta. or New Jersey.

The reason that the employee culture survey results haven't been announced and the fact that we haven't received the annual employee survey is that those culture results are so poor that it lays bare the new culture John Stankey has created which is "C-suite vs Employee" warfare.

The culture Mr. Stankey has created in his short tenure means one of three possibilities for AT&T as a company given the trajectory of employee morale sinking to unfathomable depths of despair-turning-into-downright-hostility. First either John Stankey is replaced and the company survives. Second the entire employee base is replaced and an entire non-C-suite workforce is replaced by cheap overseas labor and AI and the company survives as a small subset of what it used to be Third the company is broken up or falls into bankruptcy so sell all stock now. Which choice will the board approve?

by
| 1791 views | | 22 replies (last August 3, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tOuR7m5

22 replies (most recent on top)

I had The Stank pegged when they made him CIO years ago. Arrogant, nasty know it all zealot $0b. Has irrevocable damage while taking $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uqb+1tOuR7m5

It is a no-brainer for the no brain Stink. Less employees equals more $ for the Stink. Plus he loves to torture employees, shareholders and customers. Added bonus for the Stink! Won't stop till the day he Stinky leaves.

Wait - the S T U P I D BoD will bring the Stink back for a cool $1M a year as a torture contractor so he can go get his head polished with Ratty who collects another $1M a year too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ckw+1tOuR7m5

We are all complicit at this point. Being a manager for T means endorsing corporate decisions made and implemented.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qfq+1tOuR7m5

I’m waiting for the day someone gets up in one of his meetings and has the courage to tell him how we all truly feel about him and his leadership team.

Just unload and let him have it, tell them how they’re responsible for the debt. How they failed at every single major merger. How they gave our competition billions so they could grow and eat our lunch. How there are 1/4 of the employees we once had and they still can’t pay the bills. How they destroyed a Monopoly utility company.

Then when they’re done, the entire room stands in ovation and does not stop clapping and cheering until those on the stage all walk off in shame.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zpv+1tOuR7m5

Let’s face it. The board is not the responsible authority by which we should hang our hopes on.

They are complicit at this point. They all need to go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lqx+1tOuR7m5

Don’t like it? Leave. Your whining will change nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rfc+1tOuR7m5

Unfortunately taking away all that he did wasn’t illegal — unethical yes…. Keeping crazy high compensation for him and his elites by crushing the average man/woman.

What’s crazy and hard to understand is why the board keeps him…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gzv+1tOuR7m5
“Many of us support John.”

Lots of people supported Hi---r and St-lin too.
Lots of d-mb as--s and su-kers born everyday.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sid+1tOuR7m5

Stanky is a crook.. doesn’t care .. is a biased entitled clown.. and he will get his golden parachute, the company remains in severe debt, thank you Randal and look at the decent leaders who all left… to better places.
Sad pathetic stinky winky

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1luc+1tOuR7m5

Many of us support John.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @swy+1tOuR7m5

employees have no confidence in upper management. That's bad. but when employees believe that upper management is actively at war with them . . . . What's that Doors song? "It's the End, my friend" Stankey's legacy will be no more AT&T by 2034.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lxf+1tOuR7m5

"You are all the biggest crybabies I've ever seen. Leave....". Spoken like someone who's been here 4 years ...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ubf+1tOuR7m5

You are all the biggest crybabies I've ever seen. Leave. There are better jobs out there. Its like you are all willing to go down with the ship that Stankey is sinking. Just quit. Quit giving stanks so much power in your lives. He's laughing at you. There's no culture to create at ATT and he doesn't care. Walk out. Sick out. Find a new job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szd+1tOuR7m5

He resents the need for employees and his dislike of us oozes out of him at every town hall. He has turned it into C-suite vs rest of employees. Pointless. We aren’t the problem. It’s your terrible decisions that got us into this hole.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wmy+1tOuR7m5

Stankey does not know how to grow a company, only cut. That has been his MO at every group he has managed. He ran TW into the ground before we could sell it, and he was promoted. Typical ATT move . . . you have F/U big to get the promotion. $40B in capex in 18 months and revenue declines. You keeping using that word convergence . . . I don't think you know what it means.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mgf+1tOuR7m5

It’s not making friends, it’s down right abuse of employees. They are trying to get rid of as many people as they can that are close to retirement age so they don’t have to pay retirement. This cr-p can’t be legal. Stankey is a CANCER, never thought senior leadership could be worse than Stephenson, Stankey has destroyed the company, they don’t care about employees and they could give a single sh-t about customers. He will survive and leave with a golden parachute for destroying the lives of dedicated hard working employees. IMO he is a corrupt douche that needs the be treated the way he has treated the work force.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sde+1tOuR7m5

Three people in this thread who got T stock bags.
Didn’t sell, sad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jqj+1tOuR7m5

@tfr+1tOuR7m5

Stankey has been CEO for FOUR years. Has he “turned the company around” in FOUR years, that would be a NO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yli+1tOuR7m5

And making us work for our paycheck. Terrible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yff+1tOuR7m5

OP - TL;DR. Less is more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jtr+1tOuR7m5
never going to win friends.

He was part of the cause. He should be gone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jux+1tOuR7m5

Doing the hard work required to turn the company around was never going to win friends.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tfr+1tOuR7m5

Post a reply

: