Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Memo from Pastor Pat. Give him your true opinion. Circuit is censored! This forum is not.

Team,

We have moved our All Company Meeting to today, following our earnings call, as we are announcing significant actions to reduce our costs. We plan to deliver $10 billion in cost savings in 2025, and this includes reducing our head count by roughly 15,000 roles, or 15% of our workforce. The majority of these actions will be completed by the end of this year.

This is painful news for me to share. I know it will be even more difficult for you to read. This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history. When we meet in a few hours, I’ll talk about why we’re doing this and what you can expect in the coming weeks. In advance of that, I wanted to preview some of what’s on my mind.

Simply put, we must align our cost structure with our new operating model and fundamentally change the way we operate. Our revenues have not grown as expected – and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both – particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.

These decisions have challenged me to my core, and this is the hardest thing I’ve done in my career. My pledge to you is that we will prioritize a culture of honesty, transparency and respect in the weeks and months to come.

Next week, we’ll announce a companywide enhanced retirement offering for eligible employees and broadly offer an application program for voluntary departures. I believe that how we implement these changes is just as important as the changes themselves, and we will adhere to Intel values throughout this process.

Why Now?

Since introducing our new operating model, we have taken a clean-sheet view of the business and assessed ourselves against benchmarks for high-performing foundries, fabless product companies and corporate functions. This work made it clear our cost structure is not competitive.

For example, our annual revenue in 2020 was about $24 billion higher than it was last year, yet our current workforce is actually 10% larger now than it was then. There are a lot of reasons for this, but it’s not a sustainable path forward.

Beyond our costs, we need to change the way we operate – something many of you shared as part of our Employee Experience Survey. There’s too much complexity, so we need to both automate and simplify processes. It takes too long for decisions to be made, so we need to eliminate bureaucracy. And there’s too much inefficiency in the system, so we need to expedite workflows.

Key Priorities

The actions we are taking will make Intel a leaner, simpler and more agile company. Let me highlight our areas of focus:

Reducing Operational Costs: We will drive companywide operational and cost efficiencies, including the cost savings and head count reductions mentioned above.

Simplifying Our Portfolio: We will complete actions this month to simplify our businesses. Each business unit is conducting a portfolio review and identifying underperforming products. We are also integrating key software assets into our business units so we accelerate our shift to systems-based solutions. And we will narrow our incubation focus on fewer, more impactful projects.

Eliminating Complexity: We will reduce layers, eliminate overlapping areas of responsibility, stop non-essential work, and foster a culture of greater ownership and accountability. For example, we will consolidate Customer Success into the Sales, Marketing and Communications Group to streamline our go-to-market motions.

Reducing Capital and Other Costs: With the completion of our historic five-nodes-in-four-years roadmap clearly in sight, we will review all active projects and equipment so we begin to shift our focus toward capital efficiency and more normalized spending levels. This will reduce our 2024 capital expenditures by more than 20%, and we plan to reduce our non-variable cost of goods sold by roughly $1 billion in 2025.

Suspending Our Dividend: We will suspend our stock dividend beginning next quarter to prioritize investments in the business and drive more sustained profitability.

Maintaining Growth Investments: Our IDM2.0 strategy is unchanged. Having fought hard to reestablish our innovation engine, we will maintain the key investments in our process technology and core product leadership.

The Future

I have no illusions that the path in front of us will be easy. You shouldn’t either. This is a tough day for all of us and there will be more tough days ahead. But as difficult as all of this is, we are making the changes necessary to build on our progress and usher in a new era of growth.

When we began this journey, we set our sights high, knowing that Intel is a place where big ideas are born and the power of what’s possible triumphs over the status quo. After all, our mission is to create world-changing technologies that improve the lives of every person on the planet. And at our best, we have exemplified these ideals more than any company in the world.

To live up to this mission, we must continue to drive our IDM 2.0 strategy, which remains the same: re-establish process technology leadership; invest in at-scale, globally resilient supply chain by expanding manufacturing capacity in the U.S. and EU; become a world-class, leading-edge foundry for internal and external customers; rebuild product portfolio leadership; and deliver AI Everywhere.

Over the past few years, we have rebuilt a sustainable innovation engine that is largely in place and on track. It’s now time to focus on building the sustainable financial engine needed to drive our performance. We must improve our execution, adapt to new market realities and operate as a more agile company. That’s the spirit of the actions we are taking – knowing that the choices we make today, as difficult as they are, will strengthen our ability to serve our customers and grow our business for years to come.

As we take these next steps in our journey, let’s not forget that there has never been a greater need for what we do. The world will increasingly run on silicon – and the world needs a healthy and vibrant Intel. That’s why the work we are doing is so consequential. Not only are we remaking a great company, but we are also creating technology and manufacturing capabilities that will reshape the world for decades to come. And this is something we should never lose sight of as we push forward in pursuit of our goals.

We’ll talk more in a few hours. Please come with your questions so we can have an open and honest discussion about what comes next.

by
| 2146 views | | 14 replies (last August 3, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tOfLwcP

14 replies (most recent on top)

Some non-american bot activity proof right here: @1hyk+1tOfLwcP

This is some d-mb divisive racist sh-t. Be better folks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mov+1tOfLwcP

@gyl, yes there is a b@@mer dragging the company down, and his name is Pat. Him and his sidekick Dave have been playing numbers games for years instead of doing what needed to be done, and going into big time debt to build factories we don’t have products for. Pure madness. I don’t know how you think som rank and file working stiff of any age can make a big difference in this environment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1csb+1tOfLwcP

I am not an intl employee. I work for the competition. I read this and I see the same pattern in my actual company.

  1. Decisions made by a group of people (mostly know nothing individuals who lost connection with the real work a decade+ ago) so nobody is responsible
  1. Nobody understand the strategy because it on purpose made it so that it can be anything
  1. DEI cr-p suprsedes meritocracy. Incompetent low performers stay in place to meet quotas

Guys this is not an intl issue. It is a corporate america issue. The only companies who are immune from this are the ones whose leadership stems from their founders. NVDA, and Musk companies are such examples. The cr-p above is close to zero in such companies. AMD is just capitalizing on INTL sc--w ups but suffers from the same to a smaller degree.

I have many friends in those companies as well as your company. It is a pity how a drastic change in corporate mentality in the USA is destrying jewels of america creativity.

Till Americans will stop the trend at the ballot box by electing people who are for pure meritocracy and against DEI and similar cr-p the trend will continue.

The end result will be that China will take over as that kind of cr-p is non-existing there and people openly laugh at that kind of stupidity.

Good luck to all those who are being impacted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hyk+1tOfLwcP

Don't bring up "transparency" Pat... you said yourself you knew about what had to be done for "3,4,5 weeks" yet all of us found out through your mole/news first (again).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cpa+1tOfLwcP

Retired long ago , but the problems I observed when I left are

  • Committee based directions , with no one taking individual responsibilities. Review / tech committees (TRG etc..) having too much say , while those who deliver have to abide by these forums
  • People movement amid mid project. Projects are fun in start phase and it is a grind during delivery/implementation. Big talkers get in during initial stage , attend meetings/conferences/training , but move away mid delivery. They were not held accountable
  • expectations that once you move up, you should be detached from your actual delivery , and more focused on powerpoint. In my days , if I walk around cubes , I could identify architects (powerpoint open in monitor) , managers (I meetings / excel) , developers (studio open) etc.., all with very structured compartments
  • CEO/CFO constantly cutting benefits when the company was making lots of Money. GPTW was cut down, pension contribution eliminated , annual raise of 1 and 2 percent
  • Acquisitons that made no sense. We ki-led many companies. Dialogic/level2/altera/mcafee...
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pev+1tOfLwcP

I have worked at Intel one and off as a contractor my entire career and the 2016 layoffs was the final straw for me. I knew this day was coming and there appears to be more pain instore because the disfunctional inbreeding at Intel clearly does not support a competative product growth narrative in the market place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fpc+1tOfLwcP

Outsider here but a long-time observer of Intel.

This is truly horrible news. It could be the end of a great company.

Intel needs more doers and fewer talkers.

Let me give a clue - many doers will take the VSP and go do elsewhere; few talkers will take it. So, the VSP will deplete Intel of the best technical talent. Many (most) of the talkers are management.

From that letter, I can't tell what Intel's strategy is. Do they know? "Over the past few years, we have rebuilt a sustainable innovation engine that is largely in place and on track. " I have no doubt that there are many innovative and creative people in Intel, but if it doesn't ship, what good is it?

If Intel is to be saved, it is CREATIVITY that will save it. Just grinding out the same thing as everyone else ain't gonna cut it. Someone needs a new idea AND the company has to be savvy enough to take a chance and bet on it. Or place lots of little bets on things and see how they go.

Otherwise, Intel is the next IBM.

Good luck .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zyu+1tOfLwcP

I'm not sure how much more transparent they can get....

"Enhanced retirement" numbers equal "Voluntary Separation" number.

For the old boomers in here, who are dragging this company down, retire

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gyl+1tOfLwcP

Time for pat to go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bbn+1tOfLwcP

I am sure it will be like 2016 all over again, targeting long term and older employees. Intel claimed it wasn't so, but people over 40 were two-and-a-half times more likely to lose their jobs. This would be another huge loss of knowledge and experience if they do it again.

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2016/06/intel_layoffs_skew_older_spotl.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jzm+1tOfLwcP

He was very open and honest you all eat too much salt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bnh+1tOfLwcP

Retired now but feeling sad to see this happening.
From one old timer to another: Fu-k you Pat. You were the problem from the very beginning. You were a whiney entitled pompous pr--k as an engineer and after all these years your head is still up your a-s!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gbz+1tOfLwcP

Cold and transactional.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mab+1tOfLwcP

Open and honest my @$$

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nqw+1tOfLwcP

Post a reply

: