Thread regarding Honeywell International Inc. layoffs

Hybrid/remote workers cut

Varying rumors are that people not on site will be let go. An interpretation is that in person meetings are collaborative.

by
| 2561 views | | 7 replies (last June 16, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1t1RtEU5

7 replies (most recent on top)

2 Home 3 Office is now industry standard, it will not change.
Full remote will be challenged, there is a reduction target.
Significant number of NA jobs are set to be replaced offshore over the next 4 years.
That is the best intel you will get.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lqb+1t1RtEU5

I cannot believe work from home is still two days per week in the USA. Would have thought four would have been the mandate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ytw+1t1RtEU5

In many sites they removed seats/capacity so people are FORCED to combine homeoffice and presence in like 3+2 scenario. They simply cannot call everybody back. Or just kick all on HO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1abp+1t1RtEU5

give up remote work and you choose between two things :

  1. design goes to the lowest cost region and all existing infrastructure investment lost

or

  1. your blended rate goes through roof. can't afford big projects

The most dysfunctional programs I participate on in Honeywell are the "co-located" ones. These programs create good-ole-boy networks with zero accountability and zero objective oversight. The products they produce "work" only because there was never a definition of what "working" written down.
They succeed in early demonstrations and look great until you send the product to a customer. Then the enormous weight of shortcuts and outright lies comes due as massive bills that must be funded at the end using trucks full of money, weekends, and burnout.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pbp+1t1RtEU5

i guess former npr person's topic post above this one was removed by HR because it threatens honeywell

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gix+1t1RtEU5

Not happening

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bwz+1t1RtEU5

Which group are you in?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qnb+1t1RtEU5

Post a reply

: