The post that had the most views that clearly outlined all the ethical concerns with the CMO disappeared. Why? Maybe Elon should buy The Layoff so we can have transparency on this site. This type of unacceptable executive behavior needs to be exposed. Why let her hide it?
15 replies (most recent on top)
Tact is not her strength
New promotions were not go into effect until October 1, but JW’s BFF4Ever AO suddenly got a promotion to VP this month. SMH
Does anyone remember when the last CMO ME has his rough all marketing quarterly call in his third year?
I estimate that was when he realized his contract would not continue beyond his third year. The call about no more demand gen, switch in inbound vs outbound, etc. Was that Q1 or Q2 of his last year?
I am curious if we may see the same timeline for her.
OP: Just do a serch for thelayoff + Subject header (the layoff JW has more ethics violations than we have new logos) and it will return the lnk.
Save you the mesery of finding the right buttons, tabs, etc., and searching page by page.
https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1lVm2hgt
JW has more ethics violations than we have new logos
Just ask HR and her team, but she can’t be fired. KCC if this is what you call DEI in action, then count me out.
April 1, 2023 by Anonymous
| 8844 views | | 72 replies (last December 6, 2023)
Post ID: @OP+1lVm2hgt
Yep, I also see it on page 3 of the Active tab. But it has fallen to page 3 because “ This thread has been archived. Posting is disabled.”
So we cannot keep commenting to keep it bumping up to the top of Actuve tab.
Dig it up. “JW has more ethics violations than we do new logos” or similar title
Still there. Page 3.
Back to the original topic — the post mentioned is no longer in the “active” tab. It was removed weeks ago, after been a one of the most active posts here for probably a year. At least for 8 months.
It was removed on a day with many comments being added. As with most topics or comments deleted here, what usually causes deletion is too much clearly identifying information about a person being discussed and/or too much derogatory language.
I don’t agree with it. Just stating the circumstances.
@1btq, If you were banned and your posts got deleted, or got thrown out from a party for acting out and making nasty remarks, that doesn’t mean your free speech rights were violated. It only means the hosts thought you were violating house rules so bad that they needed to show you the door.
Agree - I don’t see what’s wrong with free speech. That’s been ingrained in American values for so many years.
Don’t you love the Elon haters who are so envious of him and his success that they post idiocy? Maybe these losers could work hard, take risks, and innovate so they can be winners too.
X is generating more traffic than ever, and community notes keeps a balanced perspective. Too bad you favor the old censorship
Sounds like you have a problem with navigating and can’t find the older or inactive threads.
Do you see the 3 big buttons right below the “topic regarding layoffs at Teradata” line? If you sort by “active” or hit the “older threads” button, you’ll probably find the thread you thought was missing.
It disappeared a few weeks ago, on a day when a lot of comments were being made on it again.
The post contained numerous examples of unacceptable executive behavior by credible insiders. We all know why it was canceled.
What was the post about? I did not see it . Could you please summarize it?