Thread regarding Avaya layoffs

Seen this play and know how it ends........

Avaya is following in the footsteps of its former competitors. The competitive technology outpaced the development of the "old world" leadership. Avaya will still be around 10 years from now, it may not be called Avaya, but there will still be many clients using those premised based legacy solutions, buying support and upgrades to run there businesses.

You really have to look deep inside yourself and ask the question, do you want to work for a company that charges you a fee to participate in its 401K program? If in sales, do you want to be in a position where your commissions are optionally paid based on the whims of someone in finance or the compensation team?

For the older legacy Avaya employees, you will land on your feet, just put feelers out there. If you are trying to get just one or two more years, you should be okay. If you are a newer employee, keep your eyes open for new opportunities.

by
| 1132 views | | 4 replies (last March 24, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rFie7Xv

4 replies (most recent on top)

It's not a buy out Apollo...

It's a "this is what we can do with the asset" and give us a stake opportunity and we are all in.

Nothing is linear. It's iterative.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qtu+1rFie7Xv

Why would bain buy out appollo?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ayk+1rFie7Xv

If Bain are now involved they must be interested in buying. In the majority of cases that's their reason to be around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vlv+1rFie7Xv

This isn't 1999.

Or even 2019?

The market has dramatically changed. Avaya lacks it's ability to retain clients simply because they'd rather focus on other initiatives and push off a rip and replace a little bit longer as has been the case since 2006.

Only way Avaya hangs on is in a totally new form. And no one can make any confident prediction until Apollo is out and you see who owns the company. That is, if Apollo doesn't just want to walk away and fire sale it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mvq+1rFie7Xv

Post a reply

: