Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Battery Storage is adding complexity to natural gas fired power plant economics

Giant batteries drain economics of gas power plants

Story by By Sarah McFarlane and Susanna Twidale

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/giant-batteries-drain-economics-of-gas-power-plants

LONDON (Reuters) - Giant batteries that ensure stable power supply by offsetting intermittent renewable supplies are becoming cheap enough to make developers abandon scores of projects for gas-fired generation world-wide.

The long-term economics of gas-fired plants, used in Europe and some parts of the United States primarily to compensate for the intermittent nature of wind and solar power, are changing quickly, according to Reuters' interviews with more than a dozen power plant developers, project finance bankers, analysts and consultants.

They said some battery operators are already supplying back-up power to grids at a price competitive with gas power plants, meaning gas will be used less.
The shift challenges assumptions about long-term gas demand and could mean natural gas has a smaller role in the energy transition than posited by the biggest, listed energy majors.

In the first half of the year, 68 gas power plant projects were put on hold or cancelled globally, according to data provided exclusively to Reuters by U.S.-based non-profit Global Energy Monitor.

Recent cancellations include electricity plant developer Competitive Power Ventures decision announced in October to abandon a gas plant project in New Jersey in the United States. It cited low power prices and the absence of government subsidies without giving financial detail.

British independent Carlton Power dropped plans for an 800 million pound ($997 million) gas power plant in Manchester, northern England, in 2016. Reflecting the shift in economics in favour of storage, this year it launched plans to build one of the world's largest batteries at the site.

"In the early 1990s, we were running gas plants baseload, now they are shifting to probably 40% of the time and that's going to drop off to 11%-15% in the next eight to 10 years," Keith Clarke, chief executive at Carlton Power, told Reuters.

Without providing price detail, which companies say is commercially sensitive, Clarke said Carlton had struggled to finance the planned gas plant in part because of uncertainty over the revenues it would generate and the number of hours it would run.

MODELS UNDER SCRUTINY

Developers can no longer use financial modelling that assumes gas power plants are used constantly throughout their 20-year-plus lifetime, analysts said.

Instead, modellers need to predict how much gas generation is needed during times of peak demand and to compensate for the intermittency of renewable sources that are hard to anticipate.

"It does become more complex," Nigel Scott, head of structured trade and commodity finance at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, said.

Investors are putting increased scrutiny on the modelling, he added.

Banks are focused on financing plants that have guaranteed revenues, three bankers involved in energy project finance said, asking not to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the press.

Many countries world-wide, but especially in Europe, provide payments for standby power plants through capacity markets. In these markets, power producers bid to be back-up suppliers.

The system has long been criticised by environmental campaigners on the grounds it can amount to a subsidy to fossil fuel. Its advocates say it is necessary to ensure the smooth integration of renewable power and that the payments can also reward batteries.

Those selected to provide back-up generation are paid to keep plants ready to come online at short-notice to meet peak demand, or to cover for outages at other plants, or to compensate for variance in wind or solar power generation.

These payments can improve the economics for gas-fired plants, but are insufficient to guarantee long-term profits.

Carlton Power secured a capacity auction contract for its planned UK gas plant, but had to relinquish it because of delays in securing investment due to uncertainty over the project's future revenues.

The UK first introduced a capacity market in 2014, and more than a dozen countries followed with similar schemes.

Battery and interconnector operators are also participating in these auctions, and have begun to win contracts.

The cost of lithium-ion batteries has more than halved from 2016 to 2022 to $151 per kilowatt hour of battery storage, according to BloombergNEF.

At the same time, renewable generation has reached record levels. Wind and solar powered 22% of the EU's electricity last year, almost doubling their share from 2016, and surpassing the share of gas generation for the first time, according to think tank Ember's European Electricity Review.

"In the early years, capacity markets were dominated by fossil fuel power stations providing the flexible electricity supply," said Simon Virley, head of energy at KPMG. Now batteries, interconnectors and consumers shifting their electricity use are also providing that flexibility, Virley added.

RISING RISKS

The start-up in March of UK energy company SSE's Keadby 2, a gas power plant in eastern England, was supported by a 15-year government contract signed in 2020 to provide standby electricity services to the grid from 2023/24. The plant was financed by the company before it had the standby contract, and took four-and-a-half years to build.

The economics for such a plant would look different now, said Helen Sanders, head of corporate affairs and sustainability at SSE Thermal.

"I don't think we'd be taking an investment decision without revenue security through some sort of mechanism now because of the inherent risk associated with revenue security," Sanders said.

"If you're investing in something purely based on merchant market exposure, you're really going to have to see very, very high power prices, if you're only running for a lower number of hours."

Efforts to cut carbon emissions may add another cost to fossil-fuel plants: countries including the UK and the United States are considering requiring operators to retrofit plants with carbon capture infrastructure.

European Union rules introduced in January require gas plants seeking to access green finance to be built with carbon capture or be able to switch to using low carbon gases such as hydrogen from 2035.

OFF SWITCHES, EVs

As the energy transition gathers pace, other developments may reduce the need for back-up plants.

UK energy retailer Octopus Energy last year ran trials that offered to pay households a small fee to stop using electricity for an hour at a time during periods of strong demand.

The trials covered the equivalent amount of power demand that a small gas plant would meet, or what could be saved by turning off more than half of London for an hour.

Electric vehicles are a further disrupter as they can be charged when demand is weak and then power homes or send power back to the grid during peak demand periods.

A typical EV sits parked 90% of the time with a battery capable of storing enough energy to power the average modern home for two days, energy software platform Kaluza said in a report published in December.

In Europe, 40 million electric vehicles are expected by 2030, capable of displacing around one third of the region's gas power capacity, according to Kaluza.

"There are lots of things the grid can look to when it starts to look away from conventional generation," Carlton's Clarke said.

($1 = 0.8025 pounds)

(Reporting By Sarah McFarlane and Susanna Twidale; Editing by Simon Webb and Barbara Lewis)

by
| 1235 views | | 12 replies (last March 14, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1pIibHoS

12 replies (most recent on top)

The National Energy Research Laboratory (which ExxonMobil has partnered with) does not support your conclusions.
@1Pzct+1pIibHoS
@mwm+1pIibHoS
@1kfc+1pIibHoS

https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/storage-futures.html

Through the SFS, NREL analyzed the potentially fundamental role of energy storage in maintaining a resilient, flexible, and low carbon U.S. power grid through the year 2050.

In this multiyear study, analysts leveraged NREL energy storage projects, data, and tools to explore the role and impact of relevant and emerging energy storage technologies in the U.S. power sector across a range of potential future cost and performance scenarios through the year 2050.

The SFS—supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Storage Grand Challenge—was designed to examine the potential impact of energy storage technology advancement on the deployment of utility-scale storage and the adoption of distributed storage, as well as the implications for future power system operations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Pqzk+1pIibHoS

If the laws mandating Electric vehicles, especially 18 wheelers, go into full enforcement in 10 to 15 years, the grid will fail.

It takes more electricity to charge just one electric 18 wheeler than the entire factory that builds 18 wheelers. Each distribution center will need 30 to 50 charging stations. Due to time to charge, truck stops will need 100 charging stations and trucks will need to charge all night while drivers sleep, so all 100 chargers running all night. Solar will not be much help for that future scenario.

I predict governments will back off some of these mandates when people get hungry and shelves empty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Pzct+1pIibHoS

Take away government incentives and subsidies and gas wins over wind and solar in both cost and reliability.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Obvx+1pIibHoS

NRGV is a leader in gravitational storage. They have several systems in China and now signing licenses agreements in the United States. Stock is going for $2/share. With the uncertainty of Lithium, this is a good time to get in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Oaul+1pIibHoS

The problem with batteries taking away the peak shaving roll now filled by gas is that the best batteries can only fill that roll for a few hours. Batteries will never be able to handle the multi day events. So if batteries skim the profits to be made in the hourly peak shaving market, who will pay the gas plant owners to stand by and be ready for the big multi day shortages? Letting batteries skim the peak shaving profits will just mean less reliable and more expensive power for all of us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kfc+1pIibHoS

Sorry don’t buy any of this battery stuff. Plus who and where are the raw materials being mined at. It’s terrible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fom+1pIibHoS

The existing grid cannot support charging stations for the electric transport trucks that have been mandated by law in California.

No way there is enough available power, including gas generated power) to charge up batteries to power all the existing cities plus all the mandated vehicle and heavy truck charging stations.

Author is dreaming, psychotic, or just to woke to form a reasonable analysis.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mwm+1pIibHoS

If renewables and batteries are such a hands down clear winning solution, why did New York need to cancel all permits for gas-fired power plants?

Gas Power companies would have withdrawn their permits if that battery article was even close to being factual.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tpj+1pIibHoS

It seems that there is a thumb on the scale favoring batteries.

Without incentives for batteries and Turing a blind eye towards the environmental impact, plus child labor, in production of those batteries, gas would win easily in every comparison.

It is like betting on the slower horse to cross the finish line first because the fastest horse is made to wear 300 pounds of lead to “even” the race.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jjg+1pIibHoS

What do you mean there isn't a gas turbine that can run on 100% H2? Both GE and MHI, at least, have gas turbines for 100% hydrogen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rff+1pIibHoS

Gas peaker plants are losing on economics on the shorter end time horizon: Li-On batteries are cheaper on a kWh basis. For 8 hours or less, you should just have a battery you can discharge

On the longer end, the numbers are not penciling yet, but it’s coming soon. Form Energy has announced some big pilots with electric utilities to test long duration storage.

Even more troubling for gas is hydrogen. There is still not a commercially available gas turbine that can run off 100% hydrogen, but it’s only a matter of time. Considering the production credits given out by the Inflation Reduction Act, green hydrogen will soon become a direct competitor to natural gas for base load generation.

For Exxon, their path is still clear. Keep investing in O&G exploration. The returns are there, and they will be there for the foreseeable future. Their time is coming though, and it’s coming fast.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rtb+1pIibHoS

Good info.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovw+1pIibHoS

Post a reply

: