Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel has future

Regardless of all negativities I’m positive about 5 nodes in 4 year’s strategy.

by
| 1401 views | | 10 replies (last August 30, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1olAwLB1

10 replies (most recent on top)

Look to the past to see the future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zaq+1olAwLB1

Well, 5 nodes in 4 years is really 2 nodes in 4 years (Intel 3 and 18A), so not that aggressive. Intel 4 and 20A are only internal cpu nodes. Other than that it is just a naming game. So don’t get too excited or too passive on it. We have enough products to space them out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dax+1olAwLB1

Yeah, Intel has a future. I wonder who will end up buying it when it's worth less than dirt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1heb+1olAwLB1

There is a future for Intel, it will be as a free IP block in TSMC libraries, just like past Motorola, Analog Devices and Zylog micros

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rje+1olAwLB1

Don't write cheques which your a-s-s can't cash

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wcf+1olAwLB1

LOL, missed mobile, missed AI, missed EUV that is just too much to make up. Intel’s luck has run out and is finished

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ids+1olAwLB1

Speaking of Circuit, anyone knows by any chance how that department of truth itself may have been affected by CPM? The quality and intensity of the propaganda there just doesn't seem the same lately.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wsr+1olAwLB1

@Op, have you considered writing articles for Circuit? The troops need to be rallied and your positive attitude could really help out the boys.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ptx+1olAwLB1

Can you explain why you are positive on it? I mean, like a rational argument?

I can tell you why I don't like it... Five nodes in four years in a commodity PC market is bad business.

  1. PC OEMs won't refresh platform every year anyway.
  2. Intel will incur factor under and pre PRQ silicon costs that will damage the profitability
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pzv+1olAwLB1

Ah stick you money where you mouth is

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xhz+1olAwLB1

Post a reply

: