Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Despite everything, the leadership thinks they got the right plan

While discussing the fourth-quarter results with Wall Street analysts, Ford’s leadership declined to detail the specific steps it will take to cut costs and make the automaker more efficient and profitable.
Farley said the answer is not simply cutting jobs, which has historically been the way automakers have cut costs. “There are things we could do in the short term, but I don’t want to just make the output the cuts without redesigning the work. This has to be sustainable and that’s how we’re thinking about it nowadays,” he said.
Will this new push to cut costs hurt Ford’s growth in production and sales of electric vehicles? Farley said no.
In fact, he said he believes separating the EV and internal combustion engine vehicle operations into two distinct divisions will actually accelerate efforts to drive greater efficiency. To prove his point, Farley says Ford’s second generation of EVs will be radically simplified, which should eventually lead to fewer problems and higher margins.

[ Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/03/ford-ceo-jim-farley-frustrated-after-bad-earnings.html ]

by
| 1842 views | | 8 replies (last February 28, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1l0Gkm4T

8 replies (most recent on top)

Riddle me this
Why is a legacy auto company that claims to be an essential part of the American fabric at every opportunity simply unable to launch a vehicle without a plethora of problems? Furthermore why is the same true for all other Ford non-vehicle launches like software?

The systemic and sustained failures can only come from systemic cultural and leadership issues. Excuses here, excuses everywhere, always someone else’s fault. Truly mind-blowing when seasoned professionals trot out “we aren’t any worse than other companies”. Wow just Wow, that is our performance standard? And well data clearly shows Ford is objectively worse, we are #1 in recalls WootWoot.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pfiv+1l0Gkm4T

“Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.” – Mark Twain.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @okbq+1l0Gkm4T

The right plan is to go all in on EV's even if they catch fire, make us a hostage of China, crash the power grid, and keep people from exercising their freedom to move about the country... so yeah the leadership has the right plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovig+1l0Gkm4T

Our problems are cultural. We’re spending way to much time b!tching whether our CEO is woke, or whether EVs are viable when it’s the upper-LL’s that are screwing things up.
Our inefficiency is entrenched by people thinking they’re better than Farley, all the while thinking nothing needs to change from the days of Mullally.
It’s 2023, we need to stop building cars in the old ford way and start changing our ways, otherwise we’re gonna fall even further behind in our engineering.
Anything other than how to be more efficient by simplifying our engineering process and parts per vehicle is just bickering over stuff that’s just politics. The fact that upper level LLs got a lower bpf shows they’re being put on notice.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jmo+1l0Gkm4T

The Ford+ Plan is more than solid. The digital company transformation is earning new customers (see Blue Cruise).

The media likes to speak only in negatives, so keep that in mind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @buj+1l0Gkm4T

They should have looked to see what GM got right. A friend of mine, who had a 2020 Silverado, was offered $2,000 less than what he originally paid in order to buy a new one. This was a no-brainer, and it was during the time where used vehicles were hot. The method generated huge revenues for GM (sure he had to wait a few months for the new vehicle because of the chip shortage but it was a guaranteed sale). GM didn't lay off people. In fact, they hired a bunch who were laid off from Ford.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wvp+1l0Gkm4T

At a time like this, the Ford family usually has a private meeting with Goldman consultants in an attempt to protect their interests. This has historically resulted in a new CEO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dzk+1l0Gkm4T

Of course they do. They are all Farley acolytes, and Farley's ego is astronomical even by the standards of the automotive business...which is really saying something.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nvt+1l0Gkm4T

Post a reply

: