Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

DXC: A Field Guide to Corporate Excellence (Bell Curve Edition)

At DXC, "synergy" isn't just a buzzword—it's a religion practiced by middle managers who haven't approved a single decision since 2019 without first escalating it to a steering committee, which then escalates it to a governance board, which schedules a follow-up to discuss whether a meeting is needed.

The performance bell curve is so aggressively steep it's basically a cliff face. Somewhere around the 99.9th percentile, perfectly balanced on the summit, sit exactly two people: the CEO and whichever golden-boy lieutenant he's decided is "strategically essential," each pocketing a multi-million-pound pay bump for vision and leadership the rest of the org has never personally witnessed. Everyone else is distributed along the rest of the curve like sediment, fighting over a 1.8% pool increase and a "thank you for your resilience" email.

The org chart resembles a conspiracy theory corkboard: red string everywhere, nobody quite sure who owns anything, and at least three VPs with "Transformation" in their title who have personally transformed nothing except the breakroom coffee machine, replaced with a worse one to save 4% on facilities spend — savings presumably redirected straight into the summit-dwellers' bonus pool.

Project deadlines run on a unique temporal model where "Q3 delivery" means "Q3 of an unspecified future year," and the only thing that ships on time is the all-hands email reminding everyone "we are one team," sent forty-five minutes after a quiet round of layoffs nobody mentions out loud.

Ask anyone what DXC actually does and you'll get a 20-minute answer involving "digital" and "transformation" that explains nothing, followed by a sigh, followed by them asking if you know of any open roles elsewhere — preferably ones with a flatter curve.


by
| 3 views | | 10 replies (last 2 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kwcs2mma

10 replies (most recent on top)

Strange how his not employing "direct reports" who are overweight or ugly but good at the job. Seems he likes a certain physique and hair colour.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jy+1kwcs2mma

@jn Mary was HR lead, she had a legitimate role. It's tedious how often any women surrounding CEOs are cast as having no apparent talent or role except to give the boss "companionship". Why don't the same comments ever surface for the men with the same access and no apparent talent or role. CEOs can be g-y, and there's nothing wrong with that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jv+1kwcs2mma

Beautifully written observation!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jt+1kwcs2mma

@gb+1kwcs2mma its obvious whats going on. Mike Salv had Mary on $6 million a year for so called "HR". Thats more like CFO/CEO pay. And he used to take her on the trips.

Rahul has Holly G and Kaveri on big money on so called roles "directly reporting to him" and doing the trips with him. There is no accountability or role.

Its like you been promised a pay rise every year, you know they are just telling you lies its never going to happen.

You can work out whats going on with Holly and Kaveri, doesn't take a rocket scientist.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jn+1kwcs2mma

@OP well said! The leaders in this company are pretty indecisive, even when the staff come up with solutions to improve something there's constantly an arrow pointed to someone else who should approve, and they to someone else & so on & then you end up where you started..its like a bureaucratic govt dept.

I think employees should stop hoping for any meaningful raise. Per the last cfo call, we've 650m of free cash flow ...out of that 400m is expected to be spent on debt repayment. Whatever is left plus any new cash we make will all go to Anthropic with the new deal now signed.

Better for everyone to look for any job that pays same salary or even little less so we can get the he-l out of this dysfunctional company.

Oh and I think to create more cash DXC could replace some of those leaders with AI...the ones who send out scripted emails, AI can learn that in a minute:)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jf+1kwcs2mma

@gb People on the senior payroll and at that level must be held to a higher degree of scrutiny, not the opposite.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ja+1kwcs2mma

@gb
What’s misogynistic about pointing out that there appears to be several women on the senior payroll who who have no apparent function except to provide consultancy services, which haven’t been described or documented, to some Csuite execs either at home or away on country visits?
However, this misunderstanding could easily be resolved If there was more transparency about what these ladies did and showing the evidence of what they do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @he+1kwcs2mma

@cr you just had to be misogynistic, huh?
It's soooo tiring and unnecessary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gb+1kwcs2mma

You forgot to mention the corporate jet.

I like to mention it as much as possible because they try to deny it exists.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ej+1kwcs2mma

You forgot to cover the other benefits in kind for the Execs like free holiday trips all year and the Birds with made up roles that travel with them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cr+1kwcs2mma

Post a reply

: