Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Experience doesn't seem to protect anyone

I've worked closely with a few core systems for years and always believed that made me valuable to Cisco. Recently I've watched people with deep knowledge get pushed aside during layoffs and it's changed the way a lot of us look at long term stability here. We still work hard, but there's definitely less confidence that loyalty or expertise will matter when decisions get made. So many of us have started looking. Loyalty has to be a two way street or it simply disappears.


by
| 1 view | | 11 replies (last 3 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ktcjnb5f

11 replies (most recent on top)

Eye wok 2 hour day ownly not one care at the cisco wen u wok hards

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h6+1ktcjnb5f

all tech companies are running the same equation:

(Cheap outsourced labor + Codex) > Your experience

and within a couple of years even the cheap outsourced labor driving Codex will be gone as autonomous development takes over

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gr+1ktcjnb5f

Experience = higher cost... you know what comes next.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fw+1ktcjnb5f

The priority is to move jobs to India and other countries around the world for more profitability. Experience and experties are not a high priority at Cisco. Also who needs experience/experties while the Executives have no vision and keep changing the directions and waste so much of the company's resources to learn.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1ktcjnb5f

Chuck is a financial engineering expert, from Cisco One to subscription, to the Splunk acquisition, and now AI. Every step he took had nothing to do with technological innovation, he only understood financial engineering.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1ktcjnb5f

@OP working hard? For someone to get promoted to Director/Senior Director/VP?

Invest your time on yourself and your family. Build up a side business that will give you supplemental passive income. And do just enough at work! Going “above and beyond” is not worth it, at cisco in particular.

In my 50s, long tenured, and consistently got > 1.25 IPF and gone just like that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1ktcjnb5f

loyalty has never been, and will never be, a core value of Cisco. Cisco is very specific in its core values. OP and others are imagining a value that simply doesn't exist in Cisco and most other public companies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dg+1ktcjnb5f

There's no loyalty or cisco family. It's all baloney to give disposable resources the illusion of belonging so they keep doing the work they've been asked to do, day after day. LRs eventually catch up randomly. Tenure, grade, pay, age have little to no weight. When strategy and planning decide 10 heads must go, that's how it's gonna be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1ktcjnb5f

@OP we don't live in the 90's or early 00's anymore. Today's landscape cranked the difficulty from medium to hardcore. Absolutely nothing besides maybe a fat redundancy package is protecting you layoffs. You are completely disposable in this new job market. If they can save a few pennies, they will throw you into the trash after you've sold your life away to these people and they won't even look back at you. There is no such thing as stability anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1ktcjnb5f

They don't care about skills or the families they impact. You are data and a number by years of service and employee number. A lot of managers aren't choosing, they have a team in HR that crunches the numbers and decided. Its crazy af how they decide this stuff.

We see the human, the people, the skills, the knowledge and the families impacted....they systematically do it with only data and numbers so they don't have to look at the damage they are doing. This is the lay off culture. The karma police will come for them, the ELT, leaders and the people doing the math. They have an unseen human cost too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1ktcjnb5f

Cisco is not loyal to its employees when it comes to LRs and the bottom line. Saw 2 posts on LinkedIn from Cisconians who were caught by surprise with the LR. One had 18 years with the company, the other had 22 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1ktcjnb5f

Post a reply

: