Of course, they have to ki-l the stock to get the dividend rate back to the 7% of 2012. However, Stank will claim it is a victory and the useless board will reward him.
12 replies (most recent on top)
Dividend going up. Economy going up. Life is so good now.
Stankey is reducing T stock price so they can buy back more stock.
Of course the board votes for whatever Stanks wants. He’s also on their boards at their companies and if they don’t, he won’t vote for their thing. It’s a huge conflict of interest at the top. Always has been. It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.
$6500 would have to be like 40k shares
Why does T even need a head quarters larger then a 7/11. Epic waste of money. I thought was going to shrink required head court. T has as always need to focus on bring new products to market, being cost competitive, and being cost competitive. After 40 years watching the company it has not items who it is. T needs to ask itself do I need customers or do customers need T. T need to focus on the customers not headquarters and Disney!!!!
"I'm making about $6500 per yr. now."
How many shares do you own?
Wrong question . . . what is the cost basis for the T stock you own.
Only $6500 in gains for the year is pathetic.
I always sell T, half my 401k is in index the rest in NVDA, and other ai stocks.
I had $6500 in gains in a day on some days recently.
T stoke is a joke.
"I'm making about $6500 per yr. now."
How many shares do you own?
You mean the stock is supposed to increase in value?
My District Level told us that we buy the stock for the dividend. I'm making about $6500 per yr. now. That's not good?
Stankey and the board are in cahoots and cooking the books.
We have remained flat through the largest and longest growth period in history. Get stink out.
I’m so sick of hearing about the “dividend”…but I guess it’s important when you’re like the only major corporation whose stock has steadily gone down for the last couple decades during the longest bull run in history.