Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Manager vs. individual contributor

Outside of Intel…
how are “Intel management” viewed?
Or “Intel shift engineer” viewed?

Would you rather be an individual contributor or a manager for attractiveness?

Looking at how poorly the company executes, my assumption is non-management roles are viewed in higher regard..

by
| 1869 views | | 7 replies (last January 3, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ktR2v4B

7 replies (most recent on top)

Outside of intel nobody cares

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jfh+1ktR2v4B

Using fear and paranoia as motivators for long, they can't be useful to an organization. Besides, the leadership (managers included) and parroted and acted as echo chambers for Intel. The bad habits inculcated will take time to wane. So, I would say, an individual contributor is good.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dmh+1ktR2v4B

I don't think it matters, IC versus Manager. Outsiders, whether customers or suppliers, generally see Intel employees mostly as arrogant and selfish, rather than judged on capabilities.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yef+1ktR2v4B

Many senior IC Gr9 and above and most managers don’t have what it takes to be successful anymore outside of Intel.

Intel be analogous to the CCP, for a short window there was actually opportunity and talent at senior Intel ranks, but the past 10 years that was mostly purged, similar to CCP

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mol+1ktR2v4B

Are you supposed to tailor your resumes for the job your apply for? If a job is for an IC, would you highlight your IC experience not the manager work?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cjb+1ktR2v4B

🤣 too funny. so what does that say about the guy who hired you since you are also ex- Intel? Big mistake?!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kev+1ktR2v4B

Having worked at Intel for many years as an IC and a lead, and being witness to poor leadership and execution, constant lying to my face, brown nosing and favoritism, I won't consider any resumes that cross my desk with Intel experience listed anywhere.

Just my .02.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axc+1ktR2v4B

Post a reply

: