Title says it all
20 replies (most recent on top)
The objective over the next decade is to lower responsibilities by two CL groups. If you are doing CL-28 work today, it has been reclassified as CL-26 work.
It is expected that your potential which used to default to CL-29, will only be CL-27 long term.
This is why 50% of the staff are receiving "Zero" raises. Along with dropping work by two CL levels, you also have to reduce merit raises to align with the new salary curves.
@gc MANY VG Employees received 0% last year. How did the executives do last year?
In PA communication for 3 cycles ago my manager told me you should be happy with VG 45% of EM are ranked below VG (G,NI,NSI)
If NI and NSI are actually based on performance, then every group would lose their BTC staff and rarely lose any of their HC10 staff that make corrections to the BTC work.
No honest performance measurement justification to place the employee making the corrections as a poorer performer that the employee making the errors.
@d4 - more than NI/NSI are not getting raises these days. Have seen at least up through VG get a big fat zero depending on CL/YEE/prior assessments.
@f5 18% ?why
@ex it can't be more than 18%
Last cycle my manager said NI+NIS for our organizations was around 20%
Wow the death star has so many ways doesn’t .
@dd dc is correct, this is well documented, first 5 years NI is considered MLRP so you either opt for PIP or PIL, unless it’s your second MLRP, then you’re out.
@dc I do not think so
@d5 If you are in your first five years, then NI is a PIP.
@d5 No. NI means "Needs Improvement" =below average but NSI means Needs Significant Improvement =PIP/PIL
Does NI rating result in a PIP?
If you are ranked NI or NSI, you will not receive a raise for the next 12 months.
If the NI + NSI range is indeed 16% to 28%, that means that up to 28% of the global non-union workforce will not receive a merit raise this year
The published targets vary by group, but they 13-18% NI, 3-10% NSI
NI was 13% and NSI was 5% in almost all organizations. A few had different distributions.
With no raises and no promotions what difference does it make?
NIS% is not the same for all organizations
Deciding the % that Need Significant Improvement prior to the start of the assessment indicates it is simply a layoff target unrelated to performance.
Layoffs are supposed to be reported to the Texas Labor Board and EM is laying off without reporting.