Thread regarding PepsiCo Inc. (Pepsi) layoffs

Rant

Funny how things changed. We used to have strong MIM teams where directors and senior directors were actually involved — on calls, driving resolution, owning outcomes, and working side by side with delivery teams during major incidents. You knew exactly who was accountable.

Now everything seems to flow through “Common Services”(unsure of what they do. Ask them and they go in circles as well ) with layers of service owners, orchestrators, operators, governance leads… honestly sometimes it’s hard to even understand who truly owns what anymore.

Don’t get me wrong — some people in those teams do work hard. But what’s frustrating is when the people actually fixing issues, managing crisis, and carrying the operational load barely get recognized, while others who are nowhere to be found during escalations somehow end up taking all the credit in leadership updates.

Maybe I’m old school, but leadership used to mean showing up during the tough moments, not just presenting the final slide saying “we delivered.”

At times it honestly feels like more governance theater than operational leadership. Is this really what “transformation” became?


by
| 1 view | | 2 replies (last 26 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1krmvjxb4

2 replies (most recent on top)

Ohhh how I miss the "functionality" of PBG. Was it ever different in 2005. Pepsi family was a common theme. For awhile anyways. Management engaged with workers,morale was high,there was actual motivation.
Now?? Esh
Well ya'll know when it went south. So sad to see what goes on now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1krmvjxb4

You are describing bottler behaviors… the ship will be righted only after PepsiCo returns to a bottler-model ala PBG …. Exactly why we used to hold PCNA / Purchase folks in disdain - they were worthless

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1krmvjxb4

Post a reply

: