Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Honestly how many days do I need to come in?

Figure it out yourself it seems. Can’t even provide a live month to date view of what did or didn’t count so we can course correct. can’t clearly explain how to ensure our days do count. Cant tell us what months count in the rolling 3 months, surely can’t be anything prior to today and this new tracking system. Can’t provide a target of in this month x number of days (pre-adjustment) for next month or the future. when a week straddles 2 months we need to go in more than 3 days??

Today in the office most people spent more time putting together tracking files for themselves and this new messaging than the jobs we were hired for because this convoluted tracking system that only cares to show you historical data after the entire month has ended.

I struggle to understand how compensation for the year can legally be tied to RTO push that has ever changing tracking methodologies.
How can this be a goal in the system when the goal is clear as mud? Why does the goal keep changing?


by
| 21 views | | 8 replies (last April 9) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knqcxtq2

8 replies (most recent on top)

May and November 12 days; April, July, December 14 days, the rest of the months are 13. This doesn’t take into account pto or sick time.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e4+1knqcxtq2

@aj In April, with 22 work days, you need 14 days to get over 60%. 13 days will get you to 59% so you will be non compliant. It will be a different number every month.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1knqcxtq2

@af this part right here! It’s because they told us 11 days (which you know averages 3 days a week). It was never 11 days, even though our tracking said 100% and 11 days a month ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1knqcxtq2

You'll need at least 13 days every month if there are no holidays, you're not sick, and don't take vacation

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1knqcxtq2

Insanely stupid they want to make everyone do gymnastics to figure out how to make sure they hit this 60% compliance each month. Also insanely stupid to roll this out when the month has already started and 3 months of tracking have already occurred when people have been under the impression if they were 3+ days they were good. I had at least 11 in each month and 13 in March and I technically don’t meet the 3 month 60% average somehow. Not every month ends perfectly some weeks like this month began in the middle of the week. Just insanely stupid that they had all this time to figure out and this is what they come up with.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1knqcxtq2

To clarify - the FAQ specifically says that the new 60% calculation applies to Q1 (even though it was just announced)

Reason being - there has “always been a 3 day expectation.” However, depending on where the days fall on the calendar, coming in 3 days does not satisfy the requirement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1knqcxtq2

They can never be transparent. They always have to pull some snake sh** and change the rules in the middle of the year. Why not roll this out beginning in January? Why not notify employees ahead of time of these changes? I'm getting really sick of working here. The ethics of this company are complete trash.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1knqcxtq2

Excellent post OP. I agree with all your points. USB senior management is grossly incompetent if they think this is a good idea in any way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1knqcxtq2

Post a reply

: