Thread regarding Fidelity National Information Services Inc. layoffs

Weak ineffective Leadership Caused this

What’s Going Wrong with FIS

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is struggling less with outright business deterioration and more with a sustained loss of investor confidence a poor executive leadership. While financial performance remains stable, growth is modest and not compelling enough to drive a re-rating plus the stock price continues to drop. Now at $46 where under the finer CEO it was 4x higher.

The company is in a prolonged strategic transition following major portfolio changes (e.g., Worldpay), continual layoffs, outsourcing and constant reorganizations leaving it stuck between.

The leadership direction and lack of strategy creates uncertainty about its long-term identity and competitive edge.

Leadership under CEO Stephanie Ferris is weak, directionless and manic and has focused on massive cost-cutting, buybacks, and margin improvement, but investors question whether this is substituting for real organic growth and innovation. As a result, FIS risks being viewed as a financial engineering story rather than a growth company.

Additional pressure comes from over reliance on third party Consulting companies, balance sheet constraints, inconsistent guidance credibility, lack of projected leadership confidence, internal instability and strong fintech competition, all of which reinforce skepticism about execution.


by
| 1 view | | 4 replies (last March 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kmy38xqg

4 replies (most recent on top)

@b0 FIS doesn't invest/attract talent like many top firms on the street do. The majority leadership is tenured individuals who mainly grew because of their counterparts in US came into leadership. Lacking real world experience, this highly paid leadership was mostly engaged in resource management ( cost ) and didn't produce any top-line growth. Eventually many of these (so called) leaders moved to US, pulled their favorites from offshore countries, formed gangs, & plagued real FIS leadership.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1kmy38xqg

It all makes sense if the goal of the BoD is to sell the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1kmy38xqg

Real engineering companies invest way more in software development than peanuts this company do. Engineering strategy with C quality contractors like Zensar is questionable. Real engineering companies have engineering leadership, not people like Satvik.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1kmy38xqg

But wait, there's more, they just laid off about six hundred developers (from a previous post's reporting, correct if necessary), this is a signal that they intend to stay on the same lazy course of forcing employees to service clients with a system held together with sp-t and baling wire. They refuse to make the kind of changes that signal that they have any intention of changing course. Refusing to implement any changes while making the employees pay the price in regular lay offs is steering this Titanic straight into the ice berg while the executives stuff cash into the their pockets pushing the women and children out of the lifeboats.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kmy38xqg

Post a reply

: