Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Hard truth Verizon needs to hear

Verizon isn’t a tech company. It’s a vendor-management company.

Strip away the marketing and the glossy 5G ads and what do you actually own?
• Spectrum licenses
• Some real estate (towers, buildings, fiber easements)

Everything else—core network gear, handsets, billing platforms, even the “innovative” services—is rented, outsourced, or white-labeled from someone else. Verizon doesn’t build; it integrates, negotiates, and marks up.

For a decade-plus that was more than enough. Mobile-device penetration went from ~60 % to nearly 90 % and then kept climbing. All the company had to do was count the cash. Hundreds of billions—bordering on trillions in cumulative revenue—rolled in with almost no heavy lifting. The network largely ran itself, churn was low, and Wall Street rewarded the steady dividend growth.

Then the hands came off the wheel.
Greed set in. Prices crept up, customer service eroded, and the attitude became “we’re Verizon—we’re great, right?”

Meanwhile, hyperscalers quietly swallowed the home: they own the routers, the streaming boxes, the smart TVs, the voice assistants. Cable operators and upstarts kept building fiber and fixed-wireless networks. Suddenly every carrier looks the same to the average customer. The only variable left is price.

And that’s exactly where we are today: a commoditized, stagnated industry where differentiation has vanished and the only remaining game is who can squeeze the last margin out of the pipe.

The easy-money era is over. The gig is up.
And now the board and execs woke from their stupor and are taking it out on loyal employees with the temporary, non-sustainable, oldest trick in the book: mass layoffs to “cook” the books for a short-term stock pop.

What is new, Dan?
What’s the plan and the big idea? Keep firing people?
AI may be part of it, but what else are you going to bring to build real, sustainable growth?


by
| 1 view | | 11 replies (last April 3) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kms04k0m

11 replies (most recent on top)

They think they have all the investors fooled with their net phone additions. Even last Quarter T-Mobile announced they would stop using net additions as a metric. Time for this company to see the light of day as it is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @150+1kms04k0m

The downfall started with Ivan allowing the CIO to constantly go overbudget with zero repercussions and starting the outsourcing of American jobs. Then you have Lowell, shedding profit centers in the pursuit of the next big thing. Problem is, he was way late to the party and couldn't catch up - Go90, Yahoo, AOL, etc.. Add Marketing and Finance thinking it would be a good idea to centralize, forcing good people to loose their jobs (jobs moved, but not allowed to bid on them). Then enter Hans, who's only credit was expanding 4G. After 5G, he was lost, maintaining margins thru deeper riffs, outsourcing, and offshore coupled with zero ideas for net adds....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q6+1kms04k0m

Chatgpt or Claude? Definitely one of them

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pm+1kms04k0m

@OP marketing LOL leadership LMFAO it is painfully obvious no one has ever worked for a modern company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ms+1kms04k0m

The OP does this periodically. They (or AI) vomit a TLDR word salad which they are irrationally and delusonally proud of. They upvote the cr-p out of it as if anyone is actually fooled by it. The next step is making self replies patting themselves on the back and claiming that they are the next Thoreau. They will then post links to this thread in every other thread on this site.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f9+1kms04k0m

@only about half of network - the point is still valid regardless. It’s like we selling the same water as everyone else but we saying our pipes are gold plated ao it’s premium. Gig is up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1kms04k0m

There is no legitimate way that wall of text has been upvoted over 30 times. On the internet such an attention span is rare and it sure isn't spending time on this site.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ea+1kms04k0m

@OP... Manipulate votes much?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dg+1kms04k0m

Verizon barrier to entry is now and always was the network. Verizon is a core utility company. Every CEO/Board since diverstiture has failed to create a Application layer to leverage. The post can be applied to any CEO. The issue after Ivan as CEO....horrendous aquistions and stupid valuations that tacked on debt.

Dan has no ability create a new busibess model... rather tgan to eliminate costs to drive earnings and stock price.

Zero doubt Verizon will be involved in a mrrger with Tier 1 cable to further drive cost efficiency.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1kms04k0m

My ideas were revolutionary. AOL yahoo oath. I am bitter for not being made ceo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1kms04k0m

This is a bit simplistic. Verizon owns TONS of fiber and transport.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kms04k0m

Post a reply

: