Remember to vote- combine voices will be heard
I get the argument that hedge funds have a bigger voice
7 replies (most recent on top)
@a7 They're gonna hear mine either way. Just saying.
I check the Board report and vote the opposite of their recommendation.
@ah exactly. Charlie happened to luckbox his way into the most historically regulation- and oversight-hostile administration since the roaring 20s, and no doubt attributes his success to his unique vision and leadership. Ba-f
@aa Charlie didn't get the big ones done until a favorable administration was elected. What does that say about his effectiveness?
@a9 CS did what he came to Wells to do: get WFC out from under the regulators. Hes no Jamie Dimon though.
Can he grow a bank and compete with more modern fintech companies like Robinhood? doubt it.
Charlie will still get his way as long at 51% of the shares keep him in power. Even when nearly half of the big institutional investors voiced a negative opinion of his management a few years ago, he still got a huge raise and did what he wanted. The game is rigged.
If Charlie and the board want your opinion, they'll give it to you.