Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

You Can’t Build a Modern Company With Outdated Thinking

WFH and hybrid aren’t perks anymore. They’re the standard. Across industries, companies figured out that flexibility drives better output, better retention, and better talent. The only places still clinging to strict five-day mandates are the ones falling behind.

Forcing people back five days a week doesn’t create culture. It doesn’t create collaboration. It creates resentment. And when you measure badge swipes instead of results, you get exactly what you’re asking for — people doing the minimum required to check the box.

Pair that with a compensation model where effort barely moves the needle, and the incentive is obvious. Stop pushing. Stop caring. Just show up.

That’s how you lose your best people without even realizing it. They don’t argue. They just leave.

You don’t build the future of a company by ignoring the market, ignoring your workforce, and doubling down on a model everyone else has already moved past.


by
| 41 views | | 20 replies (last March 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kkxjr2re

20 replies (most recent on top)

@ax Correct, the company is financially struggling due to series of bad investments. AT&T is not competing for perks, it is trying to survive its debt. It doesn't care for retaining talents, nor customers. They recently announced to increase prices on those grandfathered plans. Some will leave, others will stick and pay the increase and they are banking on those people who will su-k it up than leave AT&T plan. Even if it cost them 20% lost, they still get money from 80% who will now pay more. Same with US employees. They will just hire from Czech, Slovakia, India and Philippines. AT&T is no longer growing nor innovating, but it is being used as a cash cow by investors and executives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @122+1kkxjr2re

@mb boo hoo you… get over it or quit coming to this site. Not sure what you expect, little man

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ms+1kkxjr2re

You can’t make friends with salad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kx+1kkxjr2re

@hc that’s not true and we are not a tech company

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k7+1kkxjr2re

Most companies including tech companies have been reversing wfh policies for a few years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hc+1kkxjr2re

Assume you want to get to 45,000 employees also?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fe+1kkxjr2re

One of the hottest tech companies; AI agrees. our leadership needs a lesson here -

NVIDIA supports flexible work arrangements, including remote work, hybrid models, and fully in-office roles, with no company-wide mandate to return to the office. CEO Jensen Huang has expressed comfort with employees working from home indefinitely, focusing on performance rather than location.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f0+1kkxjr2re

Why not go find a new job? If you are not good enough to get a new job, wfh or not you are still a loser.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cx+1kkxjr2re

The CFO seemed to put some brakes on outsized expectations with all of the integration issues. Had never really thought about some of what it will take to get the Lumen assets ready to start looking like our current fiber assets. Hopefully we see some good results from the Wireless purchase since we are much further along with those assets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ca+1kkxjr2re

You Can’t Build a Modern Company With the Stink 💩 as CEO.

Enough Said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1kkxjr2re

Sure that some of the talent loss is slowing down some initiatives but they put the wireless assets they bought into play well ahead of time. They are increasing the pace of the fiber build. Even though financials can be massaged the next quarterly report will start to show how much it is hurting the overall company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1kkxjr2re

The trend was come to the office, then WFH, and now is showing up in the office. A lot of cry babies don’t want the change

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kkxjr2re

OP -- You are correct but this does not apply to AT&T. Stank's goal is not to retain talent, but to reduce head count and incurr as little in severance cost as he can. EVERY study done on RTO over the last several years shows that 5x RTO is a detriment to the company with the exception of employee expense. Stank knows this and still moves forward. While I do agree that his ego would not allow him to admit he was wrong, he is not trying to retain talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1kkxjr2re

Or outdated employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1kkxjr2re

@a9

And "leadership" has no role in fixing this situation? OK sure whatever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1kkxjr2re

We are not building a modern company. We are dismantling a dated one to prepare its assets for acquisition by a modern company. The leadership is just angling for better payouts for themselves when that happens.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1kkxjr2re

High quality post

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1kkxjr2re

The bigger issue has more to do with outdated employees that have outdated feed stagnated skills no longer relevant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kkxjr2re

True, but AI slop. Did you write that at home, or did you use StankAI?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kkxjr2re

True

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kkxjr2re

Post a reply

: