Thread regarding Blackbaud Inc. layoffs

Statement from Blackbaud Fair Futures

Dear Blackbaud,

We are writing as a collective group of Blackbaud employees in response to Mike Gianoni‘s message regarding the next phase of the Workforce Strategy.

While the message states that the workforce will not shrink overall, it clearly acknowledges that valued colleagues will be made redundant over the next 24 months. For those directly affected, and for those remaining, this distinction offers limited reassurance. A strategy framed around growth does not lessen the reality of job losses, role displacement, or the anxiety created by prolonged uncertainty.

The expansion of roles in India and the use of AI as a driver of saving costs is simply unacceptable.

If this strategy is truly about shifting capabilities rather than shrinking Blackbaud, then we believe the following commitments are essential:
1.A clear retraining and reskilling guarantee for impacted employees before redundancies are considered
2.Transparent criteria for role evaluation and location decisions

  1. We demand a fair and equitable severance package for all impacted employees that reflects their service, contribution, and the disruption caused by these decisions.
    4.We demand that employees with outstanding vesting shares retain their full equity entitlements, with no forfeiture as a result of redundancy.

Given the erosion of trust and the uncertainty created by these decisions, we respectfully ask Mike Gianoni to consider resigning to allow for leadership better aligned with the values and stability employees expect. We are asking leadership to work with employees, not simply inform them.

We remain committed to Blackbaud and to our customers. We are equally committed to protecting our colleagues and ensuring that this transition is handled with integrity, transparency, and fairness.

Should leadership fail to engage transparently and address these concerns, we will begin organizing collectively and will consider industrial action

We look forward to meaningful dialogue.


by
| 1641 views | | 5 replies (last February 19) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khsdjmgj

5 replies (most recent on top)

Who got laid off today

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1khsdjmgj

Drunk Mike from his precious sailboat: “maniacal laughing that doesn’t stop”

Chad: only laughs because Mike is laughing.

Kevin - explains the origins of laughter while trying to sound like the smartest guy in the room.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1khsdjmgj

For those who want to know:

American workers in right-to-work states retain full federal protections under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to unionize, regardless of whether their employment is fully remote with no shared physical office. The NLRA, enforced by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), grants employees the right to form, join, or assist labor unions; engage in collective bargaining; and participate in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection, such as discussing wages, working conditions, or organizing efforts. Employers are prohibited from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in exercising these rights, including through retaliation like firing, demotion, or surveillance that chills protected activities.

Right-to-work laws, which exist in 27 states, do not restrict the ability to unionize or form a union. Instead, they prohibit “union security” agreements in collective bargaining contracts that would require all employees to join the union or pay dues/agency fees as a condition of employment. In these states, workers can opt out of membership and dues while still benefiting from any union-negotiated contract (known as “free riding”). This applies per the employee’s work location, so for remote workers in right-to-work states, no such mandatory requirements can be imposed, even if the employer or other employees are based elsewhere.

For fully remote setups with no shared office but potential overlaps in employees’ states or cities, unionization rights remain intact. The NLRB determines appropriate “bargaining units” based on a “community of interest” among employees, considering factors like shared skills, supervision, terms of employment, and functional integration. Geographic proximity is not a controlling factor for remote workers; the NLRB has adapted its standards to recognize that dispersed, virtual workforces can still form valid units if other community-of-interest elements align. Organizing can occur through digital tools like email, video calls, or social media, and the NLRA protects such communications during non-work time or in non-work contexts.

If a majority of workers in the proposed unit support unionization (typically shown via signed authorization cards or an NLRB-supervised election), the employer must recognize and bargain with the union in good faith.

Challenges may arise in practice, such as employer opposition or logistical hurdles in remote organizing, but the core legal rights are federally guaranteed and supersede conflicting state laws except for the permitted right-to-work restrictions on dues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1khsdjmgj

This sounds like the narrated letter that was read aloud at the end of "The Breakfast Club."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv1I4q6lOpo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1khsdjmgj

I wish you the best in your efforts but posting this here is just LARPing. These was no email invitation, there is no discord server and this should be sent to someone in leadership or posted formally. Go do things for real or shut up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1khsdjmgj

Post a reply

: