The 1st question Elon Musk will ask Erica Dhawan is what product did you create?
Please please do not hire those people.. They are just good at talking instead of doing.
In AI world, we need someone can actually create something
The 1st question Elon Musk will ask Erica Dhawan is what product did you create?
Please please do not hire those people.. They are just good at talking instead of doing.
In AI world, we need someone can actually create something
The only thing that OpenText can create are tu-ds. Anyone that thinks we can “create” AI is clueless.
@109 LLM is one of algorithms for AI. It can’t present AI but it’s part of it. What the AI you were talking about is AGI, there’s no AGI for now. For my opinion, it’s not possible.
@f7 LLMs are not AI. They are giant predictive text if-then-else statements pretending to be intelligent.
AI does not truly exist.
Maybe OpenText should create a meme coin and transition from document management AI to blockchain.
@az Simple, I’m not a crypto bro. In my universe, I don’t need to know what Elon thinks to advance in AI. Now, if I wanted to better understand ketamine dosing…
@e7 You are actually using it now. AI is not only the Gemini, Grok or ChatGpt you know today, it’s back to decades ago. Those are just part of AI, LLm model.
"In AI world, we need someone can actually create something"
Bullsh-t. We don't need AI.
@aw If you don’t care what question Elon will ask, why you care about AI? All of these high tech are driven by these innovative, powerful, rich, forward-thinking people… That’s why their thinking, talking or acting are important.
Why do we care what questions Elon will ask?
@ad Agree and disagree. I’m bias on Elon’s mindset. Can you tell me what top company this lady has/had built//helped with that became top 5 AI company? None. That’s why Sergey Brin has returned to active, physically involved the development on Gemini. We don’t want ideologues but practitioners.
@a8 its a bit of a give and take.
The developers and trainers helped make that AI. The AI itself does not have the rights nor emotion for an interview. It cannot prompt itself yet.
So yeah the people behind the product would be who we hire for now. If that's what OT wants that's what we should be looking for.
I'll just say, the people who do often know or treat it as a gig. That's not exactly a great mindset for long-term retention. You'll get a product and a skeleton crew that may or may not use it. And the makers get a better opportunity and a new reference. Is that a potential optimization? Yea prolly. Is that a dedicated plan that solves it all on its own? Probably not. The people will have things to work in from there, but you have to keep them there an invested over consultants replacing themselves and others.
@a3 You are totally wrong. Who created those LLM, AI or human?
@OP what a bizarre comment.
In an AI world, AI creates the things. If you need a human to create a thing, then what is the point of AI?