Many companies across our industry are moving toward greater flexibility for their employees, citing benefits around productivity, engagement, and talent retention. Chevron, however, appears to be trending in the opposite direction. I’m genuinely curious about the thinking behind this shift .. what problem is it intended to solve, and how does leadership see it supporting long-term performance, morale, and competitiveness?
7 replies (most recent on top)
@dw nah…we’ll keep calling it bullsh*t because that’s what it is. It’s nonsense.
Quit bi--hing about it or quit already.
It’s an attempt to save corporate real estate equity, but it’s not going to work. In 5 years the old school ways will retire with the old school leaders (god willing) and downtown high rises will become condos.
It's gotta be meant to solve a space problem without getting back into 1600
“They are going to have to pry my stapler out of my cold deceased hands”
Signed:
Charleton Heston wanna be
- Demoralization
- Destabilization
- Crisis
- Normalization (you are here)
It’s to make Houston people quit.