Here is a suggestion for consideration as part of ongoing cost-reduction and efficiency efforts.
Within several teams, there are small groups—typically two to four individuals—who work outside of the primary states where the majority of their coworkers and leadership are located. Maintaining these limited out-of-state positions appears to add unnecessary expense and complexity without providing a clear operational advantage.
From a financial standpoint, consolidating roles within the main operational states would reduce costs related to remote support, fragmented oversight, and administrative inefficiencies. From an operational perspective, having teams centralized in the same geographic areas improves communication, accountability, collaboration, and leadership effectiveness.
Given the small number of employees involved in these out-of-state groups, eliminating or consolidating these positions would likely result in meaningful savings with minimal disruption to overall productivity. This approach would also create more consistency across teams and allow resources to be allocated where they are most impactful.
This feedback is posted respectfully and with the intent of supporting long-term financial responsibility and organizational efficiency.