He can’t take a pay cut. Otherwise he will cry like a b…h because he’s a crybaby
12 replies (most recent on top)
The “market” has spoken, why the he-l are they paying a premium for this clown? To quote the obnoxious poster from this site “and yet he remains”!
Cooking the books pay my salary. Keep on cooking.
@e3 I don't know.. Salary is pretty effin ridiculous. these people literally win the lottery EVERY YEAR despite completely stinking at their jobs.
Salary isn't the problem; competence is.
He runs this company like a Minnesota daycare. You all are just his cover up.
Make no mistake he’s cooking the books
Salary should be directly tied to the performance of the stock price to prove value, or in this case, value destruction. I say he should have to pay the company back for the damage he’s done
Doesn't seem right that an executive get paid so much more that I do. Communism to spread the wealth sound pretty good right now.
What do you mean? He gets a raise for every failure that he has, so he gets a raise every year
Stankey's salary for 2024 was $26M. His actual paid compensation was closer to $45M. The Named Execs in 2024 (NEOs like the 2MCs, Ro--h, LoLe) are earning, on average, $23M per year. Do the quick math. (23M*4)+45M=$137,000,000. AT&T lists it total median employee compensation at $112,000.
Let that soak in for a sec.
We'll have to wait until April to see what they cost us in 2025, in the meantime, feel free to fact check.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0000732717/000119312525073402/d900144ddef14a.htm#fact-identifier-22
Like everything else around here, Stank's salary is market-based. No room for a downgrade.