@as
I understand your cynicism.
I respectfully disagree with the idea that managers never take the fall. In engineering we have lost many managers in October and the ones that are left are very worried. They know they can't make the dates and get the work done with the skeleton crew we have left. The answer can't be to just address the failure by yet more firing. You can see the dilemma right? They are responsible for deliverables. If they fail, they are in the bottom 5.
After the ignition fiasco, if engineering fails in a way that causes GM government scrutiny and public outrage, it's even worse. Firing people who are stretched too thin would be like going to the casino when you know you can't make rent.
"The only thing better than a half price employee is a zero cost employee."
When has this ever been a reality? Even with slav3ry, the owner had to feed & house the staff. Robots are usually confined to a single task, and still require parts, maintenance & energy. 3rd world labor is still a cost. Even AI is a cost. Someone has to pay for the service, training, etc. and AI doesn't run by itself. Someone has to apply it.
To extend the logic - the very point of the OP was to say that "You can’t cut staff, shorten timelines, and ignore safety concerns without causing systemic failure." It's pretty obvious this is where we are headed with the cuts from 2025. Now it's all about to unfold.