Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Lessons learnt from Starbucks?

Starbucks hired Laxman Narasimhan, a former McKinsey & Company senior partner, as CEO in 2023, but his tenure was marked by declining market value (around $30 billion lost) due to a perceived disconnect between strategic advising and operational execution, leading to his replacement by an "operator" from Chipotle, Brian Niccol, which immediately boosted the stock, highlighting a shift from pure strategy to hands-on management at the company.

Key Details:
The Hire: Narasimhan, with deep consulting and PepsiCo experience, was seen as bringing strategic discipline to Starbucks.

The Problem: His focus on efficiency and process, influenced by McKinsey frameworks, alienated customers and staff, leading to poor store experiences and falling sales, despite strategic logic.

The Pivot: In late 2024/early 2025, Starbucks replaced him with Brian Niccol (ex-Chipotle CEO), known for actual operational scaling.

The Result: Niccol's appointment reversed the stock decline, showing the market's preference for real-world operators over strategic advisors for hands-on retail challenges.

The Lesson: The situation became a case study on the difference between consulting/advising (strategy) and building/running (operations), with Starbucks learning that its brand needed experience, not just frameworks, according to various business commentators.

Starbucks didn’t fail in its execution.. it just forgot what it is selling.. is chevron heading down the same path?


by
| 2332 views | | 6 replies (last December 23) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kcp5gegz

6 replies (most recent on top)

@d9 exactly. For McKinsey to be held for results would take ELT to admit a mistake and face the board, hat in hand, about how they messed up. Never going to happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16r+1kcp5gegz

McKinsey consultants are nothing but BS artists.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m2+1kcp5gegz

@aw he is a value destroyer for sure. Look at Taco Bell and Cheapotle

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h4+1kcp5gegz

The BCGs and McKs of the world have found quite a niche. They’re able to print money, but they are not held accountable for the results. Certainly not by the shareholders of the companies that they advise.

Without accountability, there is a little need for them to maintain a symbiotic relationship, they can function as a parasitic entity, which is convinced the host that it is indispensable.

At some point, you’d have to imagine that the whole AI fad becomes cannibalistic and they eventually eat their own staff.

Then we’ll see some fun posts on Reddit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1kcp5gegz

mckinsey consultants never have to worry about what regular people think about the policies they hand to leaders

it makes sense that he would be shocked at suddenly having accountability for this and many other reasons

mckinsey is all about policies that implement humiliation rituals to make people quit

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1kcp5gegz

lol Starbucks stock has done terrible since Brian Nichols took over as CEO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1kcp5gegz

Post a reply

: