Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

studies of efficient work focus

What if a work study is conducted and the results don’t align with the current hr/mgmt narrative or expectations? What if someone on the inside says she wasnt to use the results equitably?

How might the team ensure that all findings are accurately documented, reviewed, and communicated, regardless of whether they confirm or challenge assumptions?

Could workers establish a process for transparency and verification so that the outcomes are trusted and actionable and calibrated to perf ratings and bonuses.


by
| 851 views | | 4 replies (last November 9) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k9j1ep0s

4 replies (most recent on top)

@OP, @ag nails it—any study clashing with the HR/management narrative gets discarded, just like the “Voice of the Team” surveys or the “efficiency” excuses masking a 5-year-and-counting offshoring operation (the All-India project). Wells Fargo’s ghosts of the account scandal live on: coercive stacking, weighted reviews quietly shared here, RTO as a Survivor game, and “location strategy” shredding cohesive teams.

This isn’t organizational development—it’s deliberate destruction, the opposite of transparency or accountability. No process will force fairness; bullies bury inconvenient truths to protect bonuses and power. Ethics? Shareholders won’t care until the next crisis exposes the rot—then regulators will grill them again, post-scandal style.

Recovery starts by reading what management skipped in school: The Fearless Organization (Edmondson—Pixar’s psychologically safe teams innovated; Wells’ ghost teams die). The Agile Alliance shows that psychological safety—not fear—drives real efficiency.

Document everything (anonymously if needed), file with the EEOC if bias is involved, and look into Wells Fargo Workers United. Upskill outside their narrative—use tuition reimbursement for Google, AI, Snowflake, or CBAP certifications. Join tech user groups, quietly quit, and job search—JPMorgan, for instance, builds fearless teams using AI (30% cost down, 20% sales up).

Don’t wait for Engle’s $22M “fixes” or the Columbus hub miracle. My mission: fearless workplaces. There’s a better option.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1k9j1ep0s

The only thing wells fargo is studying is Return on Tangible Common Equity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1k9j1ep0s

bad faith dont look good in court yo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1k9j1ep0s

If a work study doesn't align with management's goals, it'll be discarded as an aberration, and they will only accept the parts that fit their intended outcome. For example: voice of the team survey.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k9j1ep0s

Post a reply

: