Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Pam

Does anyone have any insight to what the email Pam sent out to the Americas and Danbury groups is trying to convey?


by
| 3571 views | | 11 replies (last November 10) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k96c6h8w

11 replies (most recent on top)

Exxon-Mobil is so into doing things "their way" that they don't mind if their methods calculate less original oil in place than cumulative production from a field. After 40 years in the industry, I've never seen such a group of id--ts so stuck on "methodology" that they ignore the obvious.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15b+1k96c6h8w

Denbury is truly laughable. But we need humor in our lives. I don’t see the worst being blended into the best as anything other than that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wg+1k96c6h8w

Dengleberry

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r6+1k96c6h8w

Who is Pam?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @my+1k96c6h8w

If you're gonna misspell it, make it Denberry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @km+1k96c6h8w

All will made clear when Danberry and the Americas align. Trust the Process. Trust Pam.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g7+1k96c6h8w

@dq 🤣🤣 I didn’t realize this page changed how I had Denbury spelled. I will say Danbury sounds better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1k96c6h8w

That you should know how to spell Denbury.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1k96c6h8w

Go ask Pam

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1k96c6h8w

What email?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1k96c6h8w

I thought Pam only sends emails to DJT?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k96c6h8w

Post a reply

: