Thread regarding Target Corp. layoffs

Do you think this layoff is actually about performance or just cutting costs to please Wall Street?


by
| 2261 views | | 9 replies (last October 26) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k8c8edx1

9 replies (most recent on top)

Unfortunately the shareholders always demand to be paid infinitely more - that’s the deal when you go public. If Target can’t increase revenue through sales they have to cut costs and the easiest way to do that is through head count. Shareholders come first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fe+1k8c8edx1

@a6 Fiddelke is a maga worshipper, his goal will be to transform Target into a Piggly Wiggly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1k8c8edx1

@cg I’m curious why the buyer role is a joke? And what was the merch transformation in 205? I’m not disagreeing I’m just wondering.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1k8c8edx1

If your “wfh” routine is grabbing Starbucks, walking the dogs at noon, and meeting the kids at the bus stop while bragging about how productive you are, don’t be surprised when your job’s the first one cut to save costs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1k8c8edx1

BC wants his flowers on his way out. can we all agree merch transformation back in 2015 RUINED the role of buyers. Whoever made that decision should be immediately fired if they are still here. Becoming a target buyer used to be a golden role for anyone at a tier 1 B school, now it’s a joke and an embarrassing job that won’t get you anywhere other than working at a vendor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cg+1k8c8edx1

@a7 fair point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1k8c8edx1

@a6 its up 10% since the leaks started happening, this was a very poorly kept secret that layoffs were happening. By the time it was announced, it was already mostly baked in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1k8c8edx1

And yet Wallstreet didn’t even flinch today, because BC is still around and Michael isn’t the change agent this company needs. I hope I’m wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k8c8edx1

Cutting costs to please shareholders.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1k8c8edx1

Post a reply

: