Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Are we number 1?

Does any other company have the sh-tshow Wells Fargo has on this site?


by
| 1241 views | | 8 replies (last October 23) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k87bbegq

8 replies (most recent on top)

Wells Fargo is possibly the most dysfunctional bank. People are more concerned with surviving the next round of layoffs than actually doing their job. And yes doing the job does not protect against termination. Management is only interested in getting themselves promoted to the “next level” instead of actually managing and developing their teams. IT is in constant state of chaos and decay. CEO does not see “cracks in banking system” even though delinquencies are increasing across the board, consumer confidence is very low, and rates are going lower which will erode our net margin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1k87bbegq

The other banks have more consistent management. They don't switch from 4 hours in the office to 8, out of the blue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dc+1k87bbegq

Most companies put RTO to bed years ago. Either they came back to office or they didn't, but either way they're not still picking at the scab the way Wells leadership is. Combine that with the rolling layoffs that seem to have no end in sight, and is it any wonder a vent/intel board is seeing a lot of activity?

I

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1k87bbegq

Wells is definitely number one. I’ve checked many others and they actually talk about layoffs. And the have maybe one or two posts a month. And wells people are beyond obsessed with their ceo.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1k87bbegq

Feel free to look at other pages. BNY, USB and Truist all seem pretty vocal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1k87bbegq

I work for BofA and you have way more engagement here. It's impressive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k87bbegq

The sh!+sh0w on this site is nothing compared the the one emanating from HY and effluing across the dark fields of the republic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k87bbegq

Nope

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k87bbegq

Post a reply

: