Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

When you show up to the miserable employee competition and your opponent is a T employee

If you think we are a telecom company, think again.
BlackRock owns ~75% of T, VZ, and TMUS.
How is it possible Stankey is still CEO after the historic TMUS, DTV, and TWD blunders?
Because Stankey doesn’t work for T, he works for BlackRock (“the board”).
When Stankey fu---d the TMUS acquisition, T was looking to acquire them for ~40B.
Today, they are worth ~260B, you read that right.
From 2011 to 2025, TMUS shares gained 650% while T gained 20% in the same period.
Do you think still think Stankey works for T?
2025, AI is the hot thing. We are still not a telecom company, but an employment company.
T is MSFT’s bi--h, and what does MSFT want more than anything? T to embrace their massive OpenAI investment as MSFT’s customer.
As we know T execs don’t innovate if it was the last thing they do, so why would we do this?
The execs know that we have too many employees, and that they can backfill any “AI cost savings” by simply firing employees at any time because they know we have too many.

We’re not a telecom company, we’re a firing company.
We are a legacy asset like much of the F100 that only can be more profitable via layoffs, growth at T is dead and Stankey ki-led it


by
| 821 views | | 4 replies (last October 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k85zta45

4 replies (most recent on top)

@a7 yeah I meant institutional ownership.
~75% is BR, Vanguard, state street.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k85zta45

He’s a total corporate investor puppet clown. We know this. He’s never had an original idea and never will.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1k85zta45

OP -- You may want to check Blackrock's ownership percentages again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1k85zta45

If PSKY acquires TWD Stankey is looking at a massive payday…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k85zta45

Post a reply

: